On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not exactly. What do people think of the way I organized the numpy
> > functions by category page? Apart from the sore-thumb "other"
> > category, it does seem like the kind of grouping we might hope for.
>
>
On 21 Mar 2008, at 18:22, Joe Harrington wrote:
> What you have brought up is really a documentation problem: how do I
> find the name of the routine I want?
One way of dealing with this, could be the implementation of a "doc()"
function in numpy that helps you to find what you want. A (still
>>> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/CodingStyleGuidelines
>>
>> I realize this is a bit of a johnny-come-lately comment, but I was
>> surprised to see that the list of sections does not seem to include the
>> single most common reason I usually try to access a doc string ... the
>> fu
pe, 2008-03-21 kello 07:53 -0400, Gary Strangman kirjoitti:
> > 4. Update the docstring, using the format suggested in
> >
> > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/CodingStyleGuidelines
>
> I realize this is a bit of a johnny-come-lately comment, but I was
> surprised to see that the list
> Is it perhaps possible to make all numpy functions accessible in
> submodules (in addition to in numpy, for backwards compatibility) and
> then promote accessing them that way?
I would caution on breaking functionality out into too many
categories.
It is *very* cumbersome to constantly import l
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Anne Archibald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/03/2008, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Anne Archibald
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Is it perhaps possible to make all numpy functions accessible in
On 21/03/2008, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Anne Archibald
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it perhaps possible to make all numpy functions accessible in
> > submodules (in addition to in numpy, for backwards compatibility) and
> > then
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Anne Archibald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/03/2008, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Comment: I have read the module- or directory-name "core" many times
> > on this list, however: Who really knows where a given functions
> > belongs ?
Hi Gary
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Gary Strangman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 4. Update the docstring, using the format suggested in
> >
> > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/CodingStyleGuidelines
>
> I realize this is a bit of a johnny-come-lately comment, but I was
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> read relow...
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Dieter
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:55 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to know if creatin
On 21/03/2008, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comment: I have read the module- or directory-name "core" many times
> on this list, however: Who really knows where a given functions
> belongs ? Isn't that mostly only the numpy svn commiters ?
> In other words, using only the pyth
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> read relow...
> > NumpyDocstrings category on the wiki, and suggest that we organise the
> > functions underneath it according to their numpy subpackage, e.g.
> >
> > scipy.org/NumpyDocstrings/core/sort
> >
> > If y
read relow...
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dieter
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:55 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to know if creating individual documentation for each numpy
> > routine on the scipy.org wiki would, for some admi
> 4. Update the docstring, using the format suggested in
>
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/CodingStyleGuidelines
I realize this is a bit of a johnny-come-lately comment, but I was
surprised to see that the list of sections does not seem to include the
single most common reason I
Hi Dieter
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:55 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to know if creating individual documentation for each numpy
> routine on the scipy.org wiki would, for some administrative reason
> (or other) be frowned upon. Here is an example of what I'd like to do
> for all of
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:55 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to know if creating individual documentation for each numpy
> routine on the scipy.org wiki would, for some administrative reason
> (or other) be frowned upon. Here is an example of what I'd like to do
> for all of nu
Hi,
I want to know if creating individual documentation for each numpy
routine on the scipy.org wiki would, for some administrative reason
(or other) be frowned upon. Here is an example of what I'd like to do
for all of numpy's routines. http://www.scipy.org/sort.
After each routine is properly d
17 matches
Mail list logo
