On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 16:12, Pierre GM wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
>> No, rewrite the test to not use external libraries, please. Test the
>> functionality without needing dateutils.
>
> OK then, should be fixed in r6340.
Thank you!
--
Robert Kern
"I have come
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
> No, rewrite the test to not use external libraries, please. Test the
> functionality without needing dateutils.
OK then, should be fixed in r6340.
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@sci
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 14:54, Pierre GM wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I just updated to the latest SVN but I get a failure when running the
>> tests due to missing dateutil.parser. Should this module exist in
>> Numpy
>> or just a inappropriate test?
>
> I
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> Hi,
> I just updated to the latest SVN but I get a failure when running the
> tests due to missing dateutil.parser. Should this module exist in
> Numpy
> or just a inappropriate test?
I put the corresponding tests in a try/except ImportError b
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 14:40, Bruce Southey wrote:
> Hi,
> I just updated to the latest SVN but I get a failure when running the
> tests due to missing dateutil.parser. Should this module exist in Numpy
> or just a inappropriate test?
It's a bad test.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe tha
Hi,
I just updated to the latest SVN but I get a failure when running the
tests due to missing dateutil.parser. Should this module exist in Numpy
or just a inappropriate test?
Bruce
>>> numpy.test()
Running unit tests for numpy
NumPy version 1.3.0.dev6338
NumPy is installed in /usr/lib64/pytho
