téfan van der Walt wrote:
From: Stéfan van der Walt
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Import NumPy in Self-defined function script
To: "Discussion of Numerical Python"
Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 6:45 PM
Hi Tim
2009/2/23 Tim :
> I think zeros belongs to Module numpy, and
Am 23.02.2009 um 00:59 schrieb Stéfan van der Walt:
> 2009/2/23 Markus Rosenstihl darmstadt.de>:
>>> Another script "controller.py" calls this function as:
>>>
>>> [code]#! /usr/bin/env python
>>> # from numpy import *
>>^ This is a comment, you are not importing numpy!
>
> But he is also not
2009/2/23 Markus Rosenstihl :
>> Another script "controller.py" calls this function as:
>>
>> [code]#! /usr/bin/env python
>> # from numpy import *
> ^ This is a comment, you are not importing numpy!
But he is also not using numpy in controller.
Cheers
Stéfan
_
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:47:41AM +0100, Markus Rosenstihl wrote:
You are definitely right with your suggestion not to use 'from foo import *'
It took me a while to realise that the gain of explicite namespace was
more than the cost of a few characters, but I definitely stand by this.
> I always
Am 23.02.2009 um 00:19 schrieb Tim:
> Hi,
> I am defining a function in file "trainer.py". It requires a module
> called numpy as following:
>
>
> Another script "controller.py" calls this function as:
>
> [code]#! /usr/bin/env python
> # from numpy import *
^ This is a comment, you are no
Hi Tim
2009/2/23 Tim :
> I think zeros belongs to Module numpy, and I import it in my function file
> "trainer.py". So I was wonering what's the mistake I am making? Thanks for
> help!
What is the output of the following (please execute this inside Python
inside trainer.py's directory):
import
Hi,
I am defining a function in file "trainer.py". It requires a module called
numpy as following:
[code]
from numpy import *
import string
def trainer(train_seqs):
nul_dict = {"A":0,"C":1,"G":2,"T":3}# nucleotide to index of array
init_prob = zeros(4,double)# initial prob at 1st col
