Thanks, that's what I wanted to know!
On 11/1/09, Charles R Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:58 PM, David Goldsmith
>> wrote:
>> > I Googled scipy brownian and the top hit was the doc for
>> numpy.random.wald,
>> > but said doc has a "tone" th
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:58 PM, David Goldsmith
> wrote:
> > I Googled scipy brownian and the top hit was the doc for
> numpy.random.wald,
> > but said doc has a "tone" that suggests there are more "sophisticated"
> ways
> > to generate a random Brownian
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:27, wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:26 PM, wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:58 PM, David Goldsmith
>> wrote:
>>> I Googled scipy brownian and the top hit was the doc for numpy.random.wald,
>>> but said doc has a "tone" that suggests there are more "sophisticated
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:26 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:58 PM, David Goldsmith
> wrote:
>> I Googled scipy brownian and the top hit was the doc for numpy.random.wald,
>> but said doc has a "tone" that suggests there are more "sophisticated" ways
>> to generate a random Brownian signa
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:58 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> I Googled scipy brownian and the top hit was the doc for numpy.random.wald,
> but said doc has a "tone" that suggests there are more "sophisticated" ways
> to generate a random Brownian signal? Or is wald indeed SotA? Thanks!
>
> DG
Do you
I Googled scipy brownian and the top hit was the doc for numpy.random.wald,
but said doc has a "tone" that suggests there are more "sophisticated" ways
to generate a random Brownian signal? Or is wald indeed SotA? Thanks!
DG
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing
