Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:05 AM, David
> Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> Kurt Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
If possible, you should not build executables, it is not portable.
Compiling and linking i
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:05 AM, David
Cournapeau wrote:
> Kurt Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If possible, you should not build executables, it is not portable.
>>> Compiling and linking is Ok, running is not. For a tool which is aimed
>>> a gen
Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>
>> If possible, you should not build executables, it is not portable.
>> Compiling and linking is Ok, running is not. For a tool which is aimed
>> a general use, I think this is important. Knowing the exact tests
>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> If possible, you should not build executables, it is not portable.
> Compiling and linking is Ok, running is not. For a tool which is aimed
> a general use, I think this is important. Knowing the exact tests
> needed by the OP would help
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way for numpy.distutils to compile a fortran source file
>> into an executable?
>
> If the whole point of building the executable is to run it in order to
> parse
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way for numpy.distutils to compile a fortran source file
>> into an executable?
>
> If the whole point of building the executable is to run it in order to
> parse
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way for numpy.distutils to compile a fortran source file
> into an executable?
If the whole point of building the executable is to run it in order to
parse the output, then you can start with this:
$ cat setup.py
from num
Hello,
I'm working under the able mentoring of Dag Sverre Seljebotn to
implement a GSoC project informally known as 'f2cy'. From the 10,000
meter view, f2cy will (1) wrap fortran 77/90/95 code into a python
module (reproducing f2py in this regard) with full support for
assumed-shape fortran array
