Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building NumPy on Windows

2012-07-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having some trouble building numpy on a 64-bit Windows 7 machine. I'm > probably accidentally missing a step following the build process described > at > http://scipy.org/Installing_SciPy/Windows; it would be great if someone > cou

[Numpy-discussion] Help building NumPy on Windows

2012-07-15 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, I'm having some trouble building numpy on a 64-bit Windows 7 machine. I'm probably accidentally missing a step following the build process described at http://scipy.org/Installing_SciPy/Windows; it would be great if someone could spot what! Here's what I did: 1. installed python 2.7 from p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Ian Goodfellow
I don't think that the problem is my libraries. I think the problem is that numpy is not using them. If I build numpy with "BLAS=None LAPACK=None ATLAS=None sudo python setup.py install" my benchmark program takes 8 seconds, the same as if I build it with atlas supposedly included. I built lapack

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Bruce Southey
On 10/08/2010 10:58 AM, Ian Goodfellow wrote: Here's the output on my atlas library: file -L /usr/local/atlas/lib/libatlas.so /usr/local/atlas/lib/libatlas.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped It looks mostly the same as yours except it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Ian Goodfellow
Here's the output on my atlas library: file -L /usr/local/atlas/lib/libatlas.so /usr/local/atlas/lib/libatlas.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped It looks mostly the same as yours except it says "not stripped" while yours says "stripped." Do

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Bruce Southey
On 10/08/2010 10:01 AM, Ian Goodfellow wrote: I'm using 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04. I originally tried building without site.cfg and got the same result. After that I removed the installation and the numpy/build directory and tried again with site.cfg. Here's the otuput of my show_config(). Does thi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Ian Goodfellow
I'm using 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04. I originally tried building without site.cfg and got the same result. After that I removed the installation and the numpy/build directory and tried again with site.cfg. Here's the otuput of my show_config(). Does this mean it's actually using atlas? I ran 'make time'

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Bruce Southey
On 10/08/2010 09:06 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ian Goodfellow mailto:goodfellow@gmail.com>> wrote: Can anyone explain how to get numpy to recognize atlas? I have atlas built and installed, and I put what I thought should be sufficient, based on num

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Ian Goodfellow
Is there a log file I should post or do you just mean to capture everything that setup.py prints to stdout? On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ian Goodfellow > wrote: > >> Can anyone explain how to get numpy to recognize atlas? I have atlas b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ian Goodfellow wrote: > Can anyone explain how to get numpy to recognize atlas? I have atlas built > and installed, and I put what I thought should be sufficient, based on > numpy's INSTALL.TXT, to make numpy use atlas in my site.cfg then ran python > setup.py insta

[Numpy-discussion] Help building numpy

2010-10-08 Thread Ian Goodfellow
Can anyone explain how to get numpy to recognize atlas? I have atlas built and installed, and I put what I thought should be sufficient, based on numpy's INSTALL.TXT, to make numpy use atlas in my site.cfg then ran python setup.py install. The resulting build is incredibly slow. Multiplying a 1,000