On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 08:39:37PM +0200, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> As for myself, I'll admit that I'll almost certainly continue with
> explicit masking without using any of the proposed NEPs -- I have to be
> extremely aware of the masks in the statistical methods I use.
My gut feeling is
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote:
>
> I just commented on the "prevent direct API access to the masking array"
> part -- I'm hoping direct access by external code to the underlying
> implementation details will be allowed, at some point.
>
On 07/06/2011 04:47 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> I just commented on the "prevent direct API access to the masking array"
>> part -- I'm hoping direct access by external code to the underlying
>> implementation details will be
On 07/06/2011 08:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> What I'm saying is that Mark's proposal is more flexible. Say for the
>> sake of the argument that I have two codes I need to interface with:
>>
>> - Library A is written in Fortran
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> What I'm saying is that Mark's proposal is more flexible. Say for the
> sake of the argument that I have two codes I need to interface with:
>
> - Library A is written in Fortran and uses a seperate (explicit) mask
> array for NA
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 02:46 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry, I hope you don't mind, I moved this to it's own thread, trying
>> to separate comments on the NA debate from the discussion yesterday.
>
> I'm sorry.
>
>> On Wed, Jul
On 07/06/2011 02:46 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I hope you don't mind, I moved this to it's own thread, trying
> to separate comments on the NA debate from the discussion yesterday.
I'm sorry.
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> On 07/06/2011 02:05 P
Hi,
Sorry, I hope you don't mind, I moved this to it's own thread, trying
to separate comments on the NA debate from the discussion yesterday.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 02:05 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just for reference, I am using th
