Cython just has interfaces to the C-API, I think.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> Oh, and I'm not sure about Cython, since I've never looked into its
> details. I imagine Cython will want to short circuit some of the Python
> exposure code, since accessing the iterator value
Oh, and I'm not sure about Cython, since I've never looked into its details.
I imagine Cython will want to short circuit some of the Python exposure
code, since accessing the iterator values creates new array objects.
-Mark
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 20
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:15 PM, John Salvatier
wrote:
> Wow, great! I'm excited to try this. I think your patch significantly
> increases the extendability of numpy.
>
> Is the C-API exposed currently? Can you use the API from Cython (meaning is
> the numpy.pxd file updated)?
>
The C-API isn't e
Wow, great! I'm excited to try this. I think your patch significantly
increases the extendability of numpy.
Is the C-API exposed currently? Can you use the API from Cython (meaning is
the numpy.pxd file updated)?
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:2
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:23 AM, John Salvatier
wrote:
> This thread is a bit old, but since it's not possible to use the C-API is
> possible to accomplish this same thing with the Python API?
>
I've committed Python exposure for nested iteration to the new_iterator
branch. In doing so, I also c
This thread is a bit old, but since it's not possible to use the C-API is
possible to accomplish this same thing with the Python API?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:42 PM, John Salvatier > wrote:
>
>> A while ago, I asked a whether it was possible
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:44 AM, John Salvatier
wrote:
> This now makes sense to me, and I think it should work :D. This is all very
> cool. This is going to do big things for cython and numpy.
>
> Some hopefully constructive criticism:
>
> When first reading through the API description, the way
This now makes sense to me, and I think it should work :D. This is all very
cool. This is going to do big things for cython and numpy.
Some hopefully constructive criticism:
When first reading through the API description, the way oa_ndim and oa_axes
work is not clear. I think your description wou
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:42 PM, John Salvatier
wrote:
> A while ago, I asked a whether it was possible to multi-iterate over
> several ndarrays but exclude a certain axis(
> http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@scipy.org/msg29204.html),
> sort of a combination of PyArray_IterAllButAxis an
A while ago, I asked a whether it was possible to multi-iterate over several
ndarrays but exclude a certain axis(
http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@scipy.org/msg29204.html), sort
of a combination of PyArray_IterAllButAxis and PyArray_MultiIterNew. My goal
was to allow creation of relativ
10 matches
Mail list logo
