Also see
https://code.google.com/p/upfirdn/source/browse/upfirdn/Resampler.i
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Tom Krauss
wrote:
>
> I know this is a month old at this point, but I wanted to state that I use
> std::complex with swig all the time and it works great. I have very
> similar code i
I know this is a month old at this point, but I wanted to state that I use
std::complex with swig all the time and it works great. I have very
similar code in each of my project's ".i" files, so I am happy to see you
are adding support to numpy.i.
E.g.
%numpy_typemaps(std::complex, NPY_CDOUBLE, in
Hello,
Ok, here's my attempt --
https://github.com/gmabey/numpy/compare/swig-std-complex
Glen
On Oct 27, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Bill Spotz wrote:
> Supporting std::complex<> was just low enough priority for me that I decided
> to wait until someone expressed interest ... and now, many years lat
Hello,
I was very excited to learn about numpy.i for easy numpy+swigification of C
code -- it's really handy.
Knowing that swig wraps C code, I wasn't too surprised that there was the issue
with complex data types (as described at
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/swig.interface-file.h
