Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: We need help working on code coverage for Cython code

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > > The first step we thought of was having a group live conversation of > > some sort with the Cython developers to get an idea of what work needs > > doing. So, I think the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: We need help working on code coverage for Cython code

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > The first step we thought of was having a group live conversation of > some sort with the Cython developers to get an idea of what work needs > doing. So, I think the first question is - who would be up for > joining that? I'd be up for th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: We need help working on code coverage for Cython code

Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > Hi Matthew > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> My very vague impression is that Stefan B thinks of the lnotab PR as >> part of the process of getting the work done, so that merging would >> only be wor

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: We need help working on code coverage for Cython code

Hi Matthew On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > My very vague impression is that Stefan B thinks of the lnotab PR as > part of the process of getting the work done, so that merging would > only be worthwhile if it was pretty clear that the rest of the work > would happen as wel

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: We need help working on code coverage for Cython code

Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > Hi Matthew > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> The Cython developers have done some work on this [1] but it is >> currently stalled for lack of developer time to work on it. > > It looks like we can he

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: We need help working on code coverage for Cython code

Hi Matthew On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > The Cython developers have done some work on this [1] but it is > currently stalled for lack of developer time to work on it. It looks like we can help them with the rest of the work once the lnotab PR is merged; is that correct?

[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: We need help working on code coverage for Cython code

Hi, Sorry for those of you also on the scikit-image mailing list - but here again I'm asking for help to get coverage working for Cython code. Over on another mailing list, we've hit a big problem trying to work out coverage on a large amount of Cython code. As y'all probably know, there's no au