Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure with 1.3.0b1 under Solaris 10 SPARC

2009-03-30 Thread Jeff Blaine
FWIW, I solved this just now by removing Sun Studio from my PATH before build. It's clear that's a workaround though and the build process failed to determine something properly. Jeff Blaine wrote: >> What version of glibc do you have? > > None. Solaris does not use GNU libc. > > _

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure with 1.3.0b1 under Solaris 10 SPARC

2009-03-30 Thread Jeff Blaine
> What version of glibc do you have? None. Solaris does not use GNU libc. ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure with 1.3.0b1 under Solaris 10 SPARC

2009-03-28 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote: > >> Same problem with 1.3.0rc1 >> >> Jeff Blaine wrote: >> > Aside from this, the website for NumPy should have a link to the >> > list subscription address, not a link to the list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure with 1.3.0b1 under Solaris 10 SPARC

2009-03-28 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote: > Same problem with 1.3.0rc1 > > Jeff Blaine wrote: > > Aside from this, the website for NumPy should have a link to the > > list subscription address, not a link to the list itself (which > > cannot be posted to unless one is a member). > > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure with 1.3.0b1 under Solaris 10 SPARC

2009-03-28 Thread Jeff Blaine
Same problem with 1.3.0rc1 Jeff Blaine wrote: > Aside from this, the website for NumPy should have a link to the > list subscription address, not a link to the list itself (which > cannot be posted to unless one is a member). > > Python 2.4.2 (#2, Dec 6 2006, 17:18:19) > [GCC 3.3.5] on sunos5 >