On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Vincent Davis
wrote:
> +1, I am very skeptical of anything on SourceForge, it negatively impacts
> my opinion of any project that requires me to download from sourceforge.
>
>
> On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Ralf has su
+1, I am very skeptical of anything on SourceForge, it negatively impacts
my opinion of any project that requires me to download from sourceforge.
On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Ralf has suggested dropping sourceforge as a NumPy release site. There was
> disc
+1 from me.
If we really need some distribution on top of github/pypi, note that
bintray (https://bintray.com/) is free for OSS projects, and is a much
better experience than sourceforge.
David
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Ralf has suggested dropping s
Hi All,
Ralf has suggested dropping sourceforge as a NumPy release site. There was
discussion of doing that some time back but we have not yet done it. Now
that we put wheels up on PyPI for all supported architectures source forge
is not needed. I note that there are still some 15,000 downloads a
