On 26 February 2014 00:35, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>
> "simpler" in my original email has to be read as involving less
> operations and thus more efficient, not simpler to understand, indeed it
> is already a simple implementation of the definition. What I would like
> to know is if there are some
Am 25.02.2014 um 12:08 schrieb Daniele Nicolodi :
> Hello,
>
> I'm dealing with an instrument that transfers numerical values through
> an RS232 port in a custom (?) floating point representation (56 bits, 4
> bits exponent and 52 bits significand).
>
> Of course I need to convert this format t
On 26/02/2014 00:12, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 25 February 2014 11:08, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm dealing with an instrument that transfers numerical values through
>> an RS232 port in a custom (?) floating point representation (56 bits, 4
>> bits exponent and 52 bits significand
On 25 February 2014 11:08, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm dealing with an instrument that transfers numerical values through
> an RS232 port in a custom (?) floating point representation (56 bits, 4
> bits exponent and 52 bits significand).
>
> Of course I need to convert this format to
Hello,
I'm dealing with an instrument that transfers numerical values through
an RS232 port in a custom (?) floating point representation (56 bits, 4
bits exponent and 52 bits significand).
Of course I need to convert this format to a standard IEEE 754 double to
be able to do anything useful with
