Re: [Numpy-discussion] Current datetime pull requests ready for review

2011-06-08 Thread Mark Wiebe
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> On Wednesday, June 8, 2011, Mark Wiebe wrote: >> > I've been trying to separate out the features I've been doing into >> separate branches so I can split up into multiple pull,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Current datetime pull requests ready for review

2011-06-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Wednesday, June 8, 2011, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > I've been trying to separate out the features I've been doing into > separate branches so I can split up into multiple pull, but the development > I'm doing works pretty poorly with this work

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Current datetime pull requests ready for review

2011-06-08 Thread Benjamin Root
On Wednesday, June 8, 2011, Mark Wiebe wrote: > I've been trying to separate out the features I've been doing into separate > branches so I can split up into multiple pull, but the development I'm doing > works pretty poorly with this workflow. Nearly every step of development > builds on or us

[Numpy-discussion] Current datetime pull requests ready for review

2011-06-08 Thread Mark Wiebe
I've been trying to separate out the features I've been doing into separate branches so I can split up into multiple pull, but the development I'm doing works pretty poorly with this workflow. Nearly every step of development builds on or uses changes from previous features. Since github doesn't do