On 06/15/10 04:06 AM, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly thanks to everyone that has helped bring NumPy to the point it
> is today. Its an excellent bit of software.
>
> I've recently managed to get NumPy to compile on a 64 bit Solaris 10
> (sparc) machine. We've embedded 64 bit Python in som
On 06/17/10 02:53 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Firstly thanks to everyone that has helped bring NumPy to the point it
>> is today. Its an excellent bit of software.
>>
>> I've recently managed to get NumPy to compile on a 64 bit S
Hi Ralf,
Thanks for the information. I'll have a look at it, and see if it
solves the issue.
Cheers,
Chris
On 18 June 2010 01:53, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Firstly thanks to everyone that has helped bring NumPy to the poin
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Chris LeBlanc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly thanks to everyone that has helped bring NumPy to the point it
> is today. Its an excellent bit of software.
>
> I've recently managed to get NumPy to compile on a 64 bit Solaris 10
> (sparc) machine. We've embedded 64 bit
Hi,
Firstly thanks to everyone that has helped bring NumPy to the point it
is today. Its an excellent bit of software.
I've recently managed to get NumPy to compile on a 64 bit Solaris 10
(sparc) machine. We've embedded 64 bit Python in some of our C code
using the Python C-API, and therefore r
