Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:41:37PM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 06:38:55AM -0700, Ray Schumacher wrote:
The codeGenerator is magic, if you ask me:
http://starship.py
Ray Schumacher wrote:
> I agree with others that ctypes might be your best path.
Pyrex is a good bet too:
http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/Pyrex_and_NumPy
The advantage with pyrex is that you don't have to write any C at all.
You will have to use a compiler that is compatible with your Python buil
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:41:37PM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 06:38:55AM -0700, Ray Schumacher wrote:
> > > The codeGenerator is magic, if you ask me:
> > > http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/c
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:41:37PM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 06:38:55AM -0700, Ray Schumacher wrote:
> > The codeGenerator is magic, if you ask me:
> > http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/old/codegen.html
>
> Can it wrap code passing around arrays ? If so it
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 06:38:55AM -0700, Ray Schumacher wrote:
> The codeGenerator is magic, if you ask me:
> http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/old/codegen.html
Can it wrap code passing around arrays ? If so it really does magic that
I don't understand.
Gaël
Geoffrey Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to write a C extension module. C functions in the module will
> take and return numpy arrays. I found a tutorial online, but I am not
> sure about the following:
I agree with others that ctypes might be your best path.
The codeGenerator is magic, if yo
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
> > I haven't looked at PyMultilter objects. I am just trying to build a
> > 'vector version' of my C function so that it can do batch
> > calculations. For example, for a vector X, I can do
> > for x in X: y=my_func(x)
> > Or I can do
Geoffrey Zhu wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 7/24/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Geoffrey Zhu wrote:
>>> Thanks for your help. Do you know what exactly is the issue of having
>>> to use VS2003 to build extensions? If the interactions are done at DLL
>>> level, shouldn't call compilers th
Hi Robert,
On 7/24/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geoffrey Zhu wrote:
> > Thanks for your help. Do you know what exactly is the issue of having
> > to use VS2003 to build extensions? If the interactions are done at DLL
> > level, shouldn't call compilers that can generate DLLs work?
Geoffrey Zhu wrote:
> Thanks for your help. Do you know what exactly is the issue of having
> to use VS2003 to build extensions? If the interactions are done at DLL
> level, shouldn't call compilers that can generate DLLs work?
Mostly it's an issue of the C runtime that is used for either compiler
Hi Robert,
On 7/24/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geoffrey Zhu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am about to write a C extension module. C functions in the module will
> > take and return numpy arrays. I found a tutorial online, but I am not
> > sure about the following:
> >
> > 1. Can I com
Geoffrey Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to write a C extension module. C functions in the module will
> take and return numpy arrays. I found a tutorial online, but I am not
> sure about the following:
>
> 1. Can I compile my extension with Visual Studio 2005? My impression is
> that I will ha
Hi,
I am about to write a C extension module. C functions in the module will
take and return numpy arrays. I found a tutorial online, but I am not sure
about the following:
1. Can I compile my extension with Visual Studio 2005? My impression is that
I will have to link with numpy libraries, and,
13 matches
Mail list logo
