Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-02 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > To be clear, this subthread started with the caveat *as far as our > "officially supported" platforms go* -- I'm not saying that we should > go around and remove all the NPY_NO_EXPORT macros tomorrow. > > However, the only reason they're

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-02 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 9:17 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau wr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau >>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wro

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: But seriously, what compilers do we support that don't ha

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> But seriously, what compilers do we support that don't have >>> -fvisibility=hidden? ...Is there even a list of compile

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> But seriously, what compilers do we support that don't have >> -fvisibility=hidden? ...Is there even a list of compilers we support >> available anywhere? > > Well, I am not sure

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 06/27/2012 09:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau  wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith  wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau   wrot

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau >>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 06/27/2012 09:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau >>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building >>> numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building >> numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more >> conventional route of first compiling

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building > numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more > conventional route of first compiling each .c file to a .o file, and > then linking those together.

[Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more conventional route of first compiling each .c file to a .o file, and then linking those together. I gather from comments in the source code that the former is the