In article <1342393528.28368.3.ca...@esdceeprjpstudent1.mit.edu>,
Paul Natsuo Kishimoto wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 17:45 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any
> > last-minute changes people are wanting to push into Nu
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a PR that I think could be merged before the relase:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/326
>
> It is the addition of the inplace_increment function. It seam good,
> but I can't review it enough as it use many numpy i
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
>> changes people are wanting
This looked like an interesting one for sure. I can't look at the PR right
now for some reason (Github gave me a 500 error). I know there were some
comments, though.
-Travis
On Jul 15, 2012, at 9:52 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a PR that I think could be merged before
Hi,
there is a PR that I think could be merged before the relase:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/326
It is the addition of the inplace_increment function. It seam good,
but I can't review it enough as it use many numpy internal that I
never used or looked at. But the tests seam to cover all
>
> Bump for: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/351
>
>
> As requested by njsmith, I gave a more detailed explanation and asked
> the list for input at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@scipy.org/msg38306.html
>
> There was one qualified negative reply and nothing (yet) further.
On Jul 15, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
> changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them as
> soon as
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 17:45 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any
> last-minute changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We
> should discuss them as soon as possible.
>
> I'm proposing a code-freeze at midnight UTC on
Just added PR #359. The purpose is to allow the nditer object operand and
iter flags to be set for a ufunc to provide better control over how an
array is iterated over by a ufunc and how the ufunc uses the operands
passed to it. One specific motivation for this is to be able to specify an
input ope
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ralf Gommers <
> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > What about the tickets still open for 1.7.0
> > (http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/report/3)? There are a few important ones
> > left.
> >
> > These I would consider blockers:
> > - #2108 Datetime failures with MinGW
I wonder if this might be a blocker: Python-3.3 will
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hey all,
>> >>
>> >> We
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
> >
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
>> changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them
>> as
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2012 2:08 PM, "Ralf Gommers"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
> c
On Jul 15, 2012 2:08 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant
wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them
as soon as pos
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
> changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them
> as soon as possible.
>
> I'm proposing a code-freeze at midnight UTC on J
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
> changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them
>
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
> changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them as
> soon as possible.
>
> I'm proposing a code-freeze at midnight UT
A very small PR about documentation:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/332
Fred
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute
> changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should dis
Hey all,
We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute changes
people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them as soon as
possible.
I'm proposing a code-freeze at midnight UTC on July 18th (7:00pm CDT on July
17th). This will allow the creation
22 matches
Mail list logo
