Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-04 Thread Francesc Alted
A Friday 04 July 2008, Francesc Alted escrigué: > A Thursday 03 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Charles R Harris > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > Hmm, > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Francesc Alted > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-04 Thread Francesc Alted
A Thursday 03 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Charles R Harris > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Hmm, > > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Francesc Alted > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Ok. But str also represents differently the 0j: > >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-03 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> >> Ok. But str also represents differently the 0j: >> >> In [24]: str(numpy.complex64(0)) >> Out[24]: '(0.0+0.0j)' >> >> In [

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-03 Thread Charles R Harris
Hmm, On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok. But str also represents differently the 0j: > > In [24]: str(numpy.complex64(0)) > Out[24]: '(0.0+0.0j)' > > In [25]: str(numpy.complex(0)) > Out[25]: '0j' > > In addition, I find the new representation not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-03 Thread Francesc Alted
A Thursday 03 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A Thursday 03 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Francesc Alted > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > A Wednesday

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-03 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A Thursday 03 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > A Wednesday 02 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-03 Thread Francesc Alted
A Thursday 03 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A Wednesday 02 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Charles R Harris > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > On We

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-03 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A Wednesday 02 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Charles R Harris > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Francesc Alted > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-03 Thread Francesc Alted
A Wednesday 02 July 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Charles R Harris > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Francesc Alted > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've seen that NumPy has changed the representation o

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've seen that NumPy has changed the representation of complex numbers >> starting with NumPy 1.1. Before, it was: >> >> >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Francesc Alted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen that NumPy has changed the representation of complex numbers > starting with NumPy 1.1. Before, it was: > > >>> numpy.__version__ > '1.0.3' > >>> repr(numpy.complex(0))# The Python type > '0j' > >>>

[Numpy-discussion] Change in the representation of complex numbers in NumPy 1.1

2008-07-02 Thread Francesc Alted
Hi, I've seen that NumPy has changed the representation of complex numbers starting with NumPy 1.1. Before, it was: >>> numpy.__version__ '1.0.3' >>> repr(numpy.complex(0))# The Python type '0j' >>> repr(numpy.complex128(0)) # The NumPy type '0j' Now, it is: >>> numpy.__version__ '1.2.0.