On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Warren Weckesser <
warren.weckes...@enthought.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Warren Weckesser
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Skipper Seabold
>> wrote:
>> >>
>>
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Warren Weckesser
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Skipper Seabold
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold
> >> wrote:
> >> > I am doing some optimizations on
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 02:52 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>>> On 11/08/2010 02:17 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold
wrote:
> I am doing so
On 11/08/2010 02:52 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>> On 11/08/2010 02:17 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold
>>> wrote:
I am doing some optimizations on random samples. In a small number of
>>>
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Warren Weckesser
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold
>> wrote:
>> > I am doing some optimizations on random samples. In a small number of
>> > cases, the objective is not well-d
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 02:17 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>>> I am doing some optimizations on random samples. In a small number of
>>> cases, the objective is not well-defined for a given sampl
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold
> wrote:
> > I am doing some optimizations on random samples. In a small number of
> > cases, the objective is not well-defined for a given sample (it's not
> > possible to tell beforehand a
On 11/08/2010 02:17 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>> I am doing some optimizations on random samples. In a small number of
>> cases, the objective is not well-defined for a given sample (it's not
>> possible to tell beforehand and hopefully wo
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> I am doing some optimizations on random samples. In a small number of
> cases, the objective is not well-defined for a given sample (it's not
> possible to tell beforehand and hopefully won't happen much in
> practice). What is the most nu
I am doing some optimizations on random samples. In a small number of
cases, the objective is not well-defined for a given sample (it's not
possible to tell beforehand and hopefully won't happen much in
practice). What is the most numpythonic way to handle this? It
doesn't look like I can use np
10 matches
Mail list logo