On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>
>
> Den 7. mars 2012 kl. 00:43 skrev Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com>:
>
> >
> >
> > I don't see generics as the main selling point of C++ for Numpy. What I
> expect to be really useful is exception handling, smart pointers, an
Den 7. mars 2012 kl. 00:43 skrev Charles R Harris :
>
>
> I don't see generics as the main selling point of C++ for Numpy. What I
> expect to be really useful is exception handling, smart pointers, and RIAA.
> And maybe some carefule uses of classes and inheritance. Having a standard
> inli
On 03/06/2012 12:54 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 06.03.2012 21:45, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
>
>> This is your opinion, but there are a lot of numerical code now in C++
>> and they are far more maintainable than in Fortran. And they are faster
>> for exactly this reason.
>
> That is mostly because C
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote:
> On 3/6/12 2:39 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
>> We can augment standard C with syntax suger for
>> generics, or even NumPy arrays and Python types, using a Python script
>> as meta-compiler. We don't need C++ for that.
> I can only speak for mys
On 3/6/12 2:39 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> We can augment standard C with syntax suger for
> generics, or even NumPy arrays and Python types, using a Python script
> as meta-compiler. We don't need C++ for that.
I can only speak for myself. I do not want to be in the meta-compiler
business, and I d
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> Upcoming Cython releases will have a generics system called "fused types".
>
> Sturla
>
> Sendt fra min iPad
>
> Den 6. mars 2012 kl. 23:26 skrev Chris Barker :
>
> > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
> >> At least las
Upcoming Cython releases will have a generics system called "fused types".
Sturla
Sendt fra min iPad
Den 6. mars 2012 kl. 23:26 skrev Chris Barker :
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
>> At least last time I read up on it, cython was not able to do multi-type
>> code,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
> At least last time I read up on it, cython was not able to do multi-type code,
> i.e., have code that works on arrays of multiple types. Does it support it
> now?
The Bottleneck project used some sort of template system to generate
multip
2012/3/6 Sturla Molden
> On 06.03.2012 21:45, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
>
> > This is your opinion, but there are a lot of numerical code now in C++
> > and they are far more maintainable than in Fortran. And they are faster
> > for exactly this reason.
>
> That is mostly because C++ makes tasks th
On 06.03.2012 21:45, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
> This is your opinion, but there are a lot of numerical code now in C++
> and they are far more maintainable than in Fortran. And they are faster
> for exactly this reason.
That is mostly because C++ makes tasks that are non-numerical easier.
But tha
Using either for
> numerical programming usually a mistake.
>
This is your opinion, but there are a lot of numerical code now in C++ and
they are far more maintainable than in Fortran. And they are faster for
exactly this reason.
Matthieu
--
Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
Blog: http://matt.e
On 03.03.2012 17:07, Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
> I sort of missed the big C++ discussion, but I'd like to give some examples of
> how writing code can become much simpler if you are based on C++. This is from
> my mahotas package, which has a thin C++ wrapper around numpy's C API
Here you are usin
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
> On Saturday, March 03, 2012 04:38:53 PM David Cournapeau wrote:
>> I don't think the code is comparable either - some of the stuff done
>> in the C code is done in the C++ code your are calling. The C code
>> could be significantly improve
On 3/4/12 3:18 PM, Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
> On Saturday, March 03, 2012 04:38:53 PM David Cournapeau wrote:
>> I don't think the code is comparable either - some of the stuff done
>> in the C code is done in the C++ code your are calling. The C code
>> could be significantly improved.
> Actually,
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 04:38:53 PM David Cournapeau wrote:
> I don't think the code is comparable either - some of the stuff done
> in the C code is done in the C++ code your are calling. The C code
> could be significantly improved.
Actually, that's not 100% accurate. The C code calls the sa
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:38:53PM -0800, David Cournapeau wrote:
> This is really the kind of code that should be done in cython, as it is
> mostly about wrapping C code into the python C API.
+1
Gael
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Luis Pedro Coelho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sort of missed the big C++ discussion, but I'd like to give some examples of
> how writing code can become much simpler if you are based on C++. This is from
> my mahotas package, which has a thin C++ wrapper around numpy's C API
Hi,
I sort of missed the big C++ discussion, but I'd like to give some examples of
how writing code can become much simpler if you are based on C++. This is from
my mahotas package, which has a thin C++ wrapper around numpy's C API
https://github.com/luispedro/mahotas/blob/master/mahotas/_morph.c
18 matches
Mail list logo
