Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-09 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > I'm happy to help connect slaves to the EC2 buildbot if someone sends > connection details to me. Thanks very much, Chris. Matthew gave us access to the NiPy build slaves, so catch me online then we can hook those up. > Another thing to consid

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-08 Thread Chris Ball
Stéfan van der Walt sun.ac.za> writes: ... > I'd like to find out what the current status of continuous integration > is for numpy. I'm aware of: > > a) http://buildbot.scipy.org -- used by Ralf for testing releases? > b) http://travis-ci.org -- connected via GitHub > c) http://184.73.247.160:811

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-07 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: >> So feel free to go ahead with what you think is the best and I will join you >> in a few days. > > I propose that we following a simple migration path for now: move the > current b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-07 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > So feel free to go ahead with what you think is the best and I will join you > in a few days. I propose that we following a simple migration path for now: move the current buildbot onto the EC2 instance, redirect buildbot.scipy.org, and then

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-05 Thread Ondřej Čertík
Hi Stefan, On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> Ondrej should have time to work on this full time in the coming days. > > That's great; having Ondrej on this full time will help a great deal. > >> NumFocus can prov

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-03 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Ondrej should have time to work on this full time in the coming days. That's great; having Ondrej on this full time will help a great deal. > NumFocus can provide some funding needed for maintaining servers, etc, but > keeping build bots

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-02 Thread Travis Oliphant
Ondrej should have time to work on this full time in the coming days. I think your list, Stefan, is as complete a list as we have. A few interns have investigated Team City and other CI systems and a combination of Jenkins and Travis CI has been suggested. NumFocus can provide some funding

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-02 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > Yes, definitely. I will have time to work on the tests in about 2 weeks. > Could you coordinate with Travis? He can make it "official". I'd gladly coordinate with everyone, but I'd like to do it here on the mailing list so that we're on the s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-02 Thread Ondřej Čertík
Hi Stefan, On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to find out what the current status of continuous integration > is for numpy. I'm aware of: > > a) http://buildbot.scipy.org -- used by Ralf for testing releases? > b) http://travis-ci.org -- connected v

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-02 Thread Fernando Perez
Useful-looking: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] Buildbot status

2012-07-02 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
Hi all, I'd like to find out what the current status of continuous integration is for numpy. I'm aware of: a) http://buildbot.scipy.org -- used by Ralf for testing releases? b) http://travis-ci.org -- connected via GitHub c) http://184.73.247.160:8111 -- dedicated Amazon EC2 with TeamCity d) htt