Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of .reduceat()

Hi Marten, As a user of reduceat I seriously like your new proposal! I notice that in your current proposal, each element in the 'at' list shall be interpreted asif they are parameters to `slice`. I wonder if it is meaningful to define reduceat on other `fancy` indexing types? Cheers, - Yu On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of .reduceat()

Hi Jaime, Very belated reply, but only with the semester over I seem to have regained some time to think. The behaviour of reduceat always has seemed a bit odd to me, logical for dividing up an array into irregular but contiguous pieces, but illogical for more random ones (where one effectively p

[Numpy-discussion] Behavior of .reduceat()

Two of the oldest issues in the tracker (#834 and #835 ) are about how .reduceat() handles its indices parameter. I have been taking a look at the source code, and it would be relatively easy to modify, the harde