Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

Perhaps a pip + virtualenv build as well since that's one way that is mentioned in the online docs for installing source code. I can't think of anything else beyond that and what you suggested for the time being. Greg On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:13 AM, G Young wrote: > Ah, yes, that is true. That point had completely escaped my mind. In > light of this, it seems that it's not worth the while then to completely > switch over to pip + virtualenv. It's might be better actually to rewrite > the current Appveyor t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

Ah, yes, that is true. That point had completely escaped my mind. In light of this, it seems that it's not worth the while then to completely switch over to pip + virtualenv. It's might be better actually to rewrite the current Appveyor tests to use environments so that the test suite can be exp

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

> On Jan 25, 2016, at 5:21 PM, G Young wrote: > > With regards to testing numpy, both Conda and Pip + Virtualenv work quite > well. I have used both to install master and run unit tests, and both pass > with flying colors. This chart here illustrates my point nicely as well. > > However,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

Conda can generally install older versions of python in environments: conda create -n myenv python=3.4 You really don't need any particular initial version of python/conda in order to do this. You do, however, need to activate the new environment to use it: activate myenv (For windows, you do

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

With regards to testing numpy, both Conda and Pip + Virtualenv work quite well. I have used both to install master and run unit tests, and both pass with flying colors. This chart here illustrates my point nicely as we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, G Young wrote: > Hello all, > > I currently have a branch on my fork (not PR) where I am experimenting with > running Appveyor CI via Virtualenv instead of Conda. I have build running > here. What do people think of using Virtualenv (as we do on Travis) instead >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

Hello all, I currently have a branch on my fork (not PR) where I am experimenting with running Appveyor CI via Virtualenv instead of Conda. I have build running here . What do people think of using Virtualenv (as we do on Travis) i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ian Henriksen < insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:14 AM Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> That would be quite useful I think. 32/64-bit issues are mostly >> orthogonal to py2/py3 ones, so may only a 32-bit Python 3.5 build to keep >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:14 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > That would be quite useful I think. 32/64-bit issues are mostly orthogonal > to py2/py3 ones, so may only a 32-bit Python 3.5 build to keep things fast? > Done in https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/6874. Hope this helps, -Ian __

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Ian Henriksen < insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it >> would be easy to add win32? >> > > It'd be really easy to add 32 bit builds. The main reason I didn't was > because appveyor only

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

> > The Python 3 build runs much faster than the Python 2. You can close and >> reopen my testing PR to check what happens if you enable the numpy project. > > I'm not sure why this is the case. MSVC 2015 is generally better about a lot of things, but it's surprising that the speed difference is so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

> > Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it > would be easy to add win32? > It'd be really easy to add 32 bit builds. The main reason I didn't was because appveyor only gives one concurrent build job for free, and I didn't want to slow things down too much. I can get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: [...] >> > Nathaniel, if you have an appveyor account that lets you have access to >> > the >> > numpy repo, co

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > [...] > >> Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it > >> would be easy to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > [...] > >> Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it > >> would be easy to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> [...] >> Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it >> would be easy to add win32? > > > Don't know. I also noticed a bunch of permission errors wi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Charles R Harris < > c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Just checking if someone has already registered numpy on appveyor. If >> not, I intend to rename my personal account. Note that as

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > The work is in convincing the one person (that I know about) who has >>> > acc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > The work is in convincing the one person (that I know about) who has >> access to the appropriate permissions to pay attention to my

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > The work is in convincing the one person (that I know about) who has > access to the appropriate permissions to pay attention to my email... I've > made several attempts at getting this set up with no effect so far :-/ But > yeah,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

> The work is in convincing the one person (that I know about) who has access to the appropriate permissions to pay attention to my email... I've made several attempts at getting this set up with no effect so far :-/ But yeah, it does need to be done in any case so I'll try again. I tried simple

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Dec 20, 2015 12:45 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Dec 20, 2015 12:23 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> O

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2015 12:23 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Dec 20, 2015 12:23 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Dec 20, 2015 12:23 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Go

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris < >>> charl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Just checking if someone

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Just checking if someone has already registered numpy on appveyor. If >> not, I intend to rename my personal account. Note that as

Re: [Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Just checking if someone has already registered numpy on appveyor. If not, > I intend to rename my personal account. Note that as AFAICT, someone has to > be the admin for appveyor, and that someone, like everyone else, can on

[Numpy-discussion] AppVeyor

Hi All, Just checking if someone has already registered numpy on appveyor. If not, I intend to rename my personal account. Note that as AFAICT, someone has to be the admin for appveyor, and that someone, like everyone else, can only have one account on appveyor. Other folks with accounts can be ad

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Do line endings in the scripts matter? > I have no idea if powershell cares about line endings, but if you are using git, then you'll want to make sure that your repo is properly configured to normalize line endings -- then there should b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

I develop on linux and osx, and I haven't experienced any Appveyor problems related to line endings, so I assume it's normalized somehow. -Robert On Mar 5, 2015 5:08 PM, "Charles R Harris" wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Robert McGibbon > wrote: > >> From my experience, it's pretty

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Robert McGibbon wrote: > From my experience, it's pretty easy, assuming you're prepared to pick up > some powershell. > Some useful resources are > > - Olivier Grisel's example. > https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo > - I made a similar example, using

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

>From my experience, it's pretty easy, assuming you're prepared to pick up some powershell. Some useful resources are - Olivier Grisel's example. https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo - I made a similar example, using conda. https://github.com/rmcgibbo/python-appveyor-conda-example On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi Chuck > > On 2015-03-05 10:09:08, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is > > this something we could use to test/build numpy on windows > > machines? It is free for open source. >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

Same for MNE-Python: https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/blob/master/appveyor.yml Denis 2015-03-05 20:42 GMT+01:00 Stefan van der Walt : > Hi Chuck > > On 2015-03-05 10:09:08, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is > > this something we c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

Hi Chuck On 2015-03-05 10:09:08, Charles R Harris wrote: > Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is > this something we could use to test/build numpy on windows > machines? It is free for open source. We already use this for scikit-image, and you are welcome to grab the s

[Numpy-discussion] appveyor CI

Anyone familiar with appveyor ? Is this something we could use to test/build numpy on windows machines? It is free for open source. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman