On 24. feb. 2013, at 02:20, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
Hello,
i know that the array object is already crowded,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> i know that the array object is al
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 11:16 +0100, Todd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:04 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM,
> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebasti
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:04 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrot
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:04 -0500, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki
> >>> wr
Hi,
Le 23/02/2013 20:25, Nathaniel Smith a écrit :
> My gut feeling is that we have too many methods on ndarray, not too
> few, but in any case, can you elaborate? What's the rationale for why
> np.abs(a) is so much harder than a.abs(), and why this function and
> not other unary functions?
(Just
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > First, sorry that i didnt search for an old thread, but be
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > First, sorry that i didnt search for an old thread, but because i
>> disagree with
>> > conclusion i would at
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:50 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki
> wrote:
> >
> > First, sorry that i didnt search for an old thread, but because i
> disagree with
> > conclusion i would at least address my reason:
> >
> >> I don't like
> >> np.abs(arr)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:49 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
>>> > wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >> i know that the array object is a
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
> >> to see the abs method added, especi
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki
> wrote:
> >
> > First, sorry that i didnt search for an old thread, but because i
> disagree with
> > conclusion i would at least address my reason:
> >
> >> I don't like
> >> np.abs(arr).
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
>
> First, sorry that i didnt search for an old thread, but because i
disagree with
> conclusion i would at least address my reason:
>
>> I don't like
>> np.abs(arr).max()
>> because I have to concentrate to much on the braces, especially if
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
> My issue is having to remember which ones are methods and which ones are
> functions. There doesn't seem to be a rhyme or reason for the choices, and
> I would rather like to see that a line is drawn, but I am not picky as to
> where it is
First, sorry that i didnt search for an old thread, but because i disagree with
conclusion i would at least address my reason:
> I don't like
> np.abs(arr).max()
> because I have to concentrate to much on the braces, especially if arr
> is a calculation
This exactly, adding an abs into an old e
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 8:20 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Kern
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki
> wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> i know that the array object is already crowded, but i w
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
>>> to see the abs method added, especially do
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
>> Hello,
>> i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
>> to see the abs method added, especially doing work on the console.
>> Considering that many much less
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
> > Hello,
> > i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
> > to see the abs method added, especially doing work on the console.
> > Considering that many muc
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
> Hello,
> i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
> to see the abs method added, especially doing work on the console.
> Considering that many much less used functions are also implemented
> as a method, i don't thi
Hello,
i know that the array object is already crowded, but i would like
to see the abs method added, especially doing work on the console.
Considering that many much less used functions are also implemented
as a method, i don't think adding one more would be problematic.
greetings
Till
_
22 matches
Mail list logo
