On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> I agree with what you're arguing for here (as little impact as possible on
> existing users), but your view of especially 1.6.x seems to be skewed by
> regressions and changes that were either unintended or thought to be okay
> because the af
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I think we need to update this document:
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/ApiDeprecation
>
Sounds fine to me to make the period for removal longer, or even to by
default aim to not remove deprecated API's at all in minor release (unl
I think we need to update this document:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/ApiDeprecation
I don't think this characterizes the opinion of all involved in NumPy
development (it is certainly not the way I view our commitment to users).
Incidentally, in the migration from Trac we should move
