Eelco Hoogendoorn writes:
> That is good to know. The boost documentation makes it appear as if bjam is
> the only way to build boost.python, but good to see examples to the
> contrary!
Quite. I really wish they would officially adopt something more
sensible, but in the meantime, using alternativ
That is good to know. The boost documentation makes it appear as if bjam is
the only way to build boost.python, but good to see examples to the
contrary!
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Toby St Clere Smithe <
pyvienn...@tsmithe.net> wrote:
> Eelco Hoogendoorn writes:
> > I have a file numpy_bo
Eelco Hoogendoorn writes:
> I have a file numpy_boost_python.hpp in one of my projects by Michael
> Droettboom (can seem to find an online source anymore!), which adds
> mappings between numpy.ndarray and boost.ndarray, which is very neat
> and seemless. But like boost.python, it tightly couples w
I have a file numpy_boost_python.hpp in one of my projects by Michael
Droettboom (can seem to find an online source anymore!), which adds
mappings between numpy.ndarray and boost.ndarray, which is very neat
and seemless. But like boost.python, it tightly couples with the
clusterfuck that is bjam. H
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project. While
> boost.python is a very nice package, its distributability is nothing short
> of nonexistent, so its great to have a pure python binding genera
Eelco Hoogendoorn writes:
> I have; but if I recall correctly, it does not solve the problem of
> distributing code that uses it, or does it?
Indeed not. But the Boost licence is very liberal, so I just link it
statically; for source distributions, I just ship a minimal copy of the
Boost sources
I have; but if I recall correctly, it does not solve the problem of
distributing code that uses it, or does it?
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Toby St Clere Smithe <
pyvienn...@tsmithe.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eelco Hoogendoorn writes:
> > Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project
Hi,
Eelco Hoogendoorn writes:
> Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project. While boost.python
> is a very nice package, its distributability is nothing short of
> nonexistent, so its great to have a pure python binding generator.
>
> One thing which I have often found frustrating is
Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this project. While boost.python
is a very nice package, its distributability is nothing short of
nonexistent, so its great to have a pure python binding generator.
One thing which I have often found frustrating is natural ndarray interop
between python a
Hello All,
I am *extremely *pleased to be able to announce the version 0.4 release of
xdress. This version contains much anticipated full support for Clang as a
parser! This is almost entirely due to the efforts of Geoffrey Irving.
Please thank him the next time you get a chance :)
This releas
10 matches
Mail list logo
