Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/11 10:33 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Did you mean to send this just to me? It seems like the whole is > generally interesting and helpful, at least to me... I did mean to send to the list -- I've done that now. > Well, the current code doesn't split on \r in py3k, admittedly that > must be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Sorry to keep harping on this, but for history's sake, I was one of the folks that got 'U' introduced in the first place. I was dealing with a nightmare of unix, mac and dos test files, 'U' was a godsend. On 4/5/11 4:51 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > The difference between 'rt' and 'U' is (this is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/2011 7:44 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Chris

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > > > > > > ==

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > > > > > > ==

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > == > FAIL: test_iterator.tes

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 4/5/11 3:36 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >>> I disagree that U makes no sense for binary file reading. > > I wasn't saying that it made no sense to have a "U" mode for binary file > reading, what I meant is that by the python2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/11 3:36 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >> I disagree that U makes no sense for binary file reading. I wasn't saying that it made no sense to have a "U" mode for binary file reading, what I meant is that by the python2 definition, it made no sense. In Python 2, the ONLY difference between

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > == > FAIL: test_iterator.test_iter_broadcasting_errors > -

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Barker > wrote: >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >>>     IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes no >>>     sense when used with "b" for binary. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >>     IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes no >>     sense when used with "b" for binary. I looked at the code a ways back, >>     and I can't remember the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charle

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker < > chris.bar...@noaa.gov> > > wrote: > >> > >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> > IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker > wrote: >> >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >     IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes >> > no >> >     sense when used with "b" for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes > no > > sense when used with "b" for binary. I looked at the code a ways > back, > > and I can't remember t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes no > sense when used with "b" for binary. I looked at the code a ways back, > and I can't remember the resolution order, but there isn't any checking > for incompatible

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

SUSE 11.3, python 2.7, gcc 4.3.4, gfortran from gcc 4.6.0, I get two failures on commit 1439a8ddcb2eda20fa102aa44e846783f29c0af3 (head of 1.6.x maintenance branch). --George. == FAIL: Test basic arithmetic function errors --

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > >> On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris >> >> >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py"

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > > >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", > >>> line 477, in open > >>> return _file_openers[ext](foun

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Superpack is OK on Windows Vista 64bit with Python 2.7 32bit. Alan Isaac Ran 2993 tests in 25.707s OK (KNOWNFAIL=9, SKIP=5) Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.6.0b2 NumPy is installed in c:\Python27\lib\site-packages\numpy Python version 2.7 (r27:82525, Jul 4 2010, 09:01:59) [MSC v.150

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > > >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", > >>> line 477, in open > >>> return _file_openers[ext](foun

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", >>> line 477, in open >>> return _file_openers[ext](found, mode=mode) >>> IOError: invalid mode: Ub >>> >> >> Guess that w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy >> 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this >> release, the beta testing phase will last

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any problems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:03 AM, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> >>> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> >> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy >> > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive cha

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi all, On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any prob

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please test this beta and report any problems on the Numpy mailing list. Many bug fixes went in si