On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 10:59 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> About the imaginary part being ignored for all/any function...
>
>
>
>
> > The all method fail
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> About the imaginary part being ignored for all/any function...
>
>
>
>
> > The all method fails also.
> >
> > In [1]: a = zeros(5, complex)
> >
> > In [2]: a.imag = 1
> >
> > In [3]: a.all()
> > Out[3]: False
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> I
Hey,
About the imaginary part being ignored for all/any function...
> The all method fails also.
>
> In [1]: a = zeros(5, complex)
>
> In [2]: a.imag = 1
>
> In [3]: a.all()
> Out[3]: False
>
> Chuck
>
I believe this diff fixes the issue (also posted on Tracker), I doubt
its the best way
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second beta release of
>> NumPy 1.7.0b2.
>>
>> Sources and binary installers can be found at
>> https://sourcefor
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second beta release of
> NumPy 1.7.0b2.
>
> Sources and binary installers can be found at
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0b2/
>
> Please test this release and
Hi,
thanks for that script. It seam very useful for that case.
As other people know about this problem, I won't need to bisect.
thanks
Fred
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 25.09.2012 00:55, Frédéric Bastien kirjoitti:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Charles R Harr
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
Hi,
I tested this new beta on
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tested this new beta on Theano and discovered an interface change
>>> that was not there i
25.09.2012 00:55, Frédéric Bastien kirjoitti:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Charles R Harris
[clip]
>> I think this problem has been brought up on the list. It is interesting that
>> it turned up after the first beta. Could you do a bisection to discover
>> which commit is responsible?
>
> I'
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tested this new beta on Theano and discovered an interface change
>> that was not there in the beta 1.
>>
>> New behavior:
>> numpy.ndindex().next()
>> (0,)
>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tested this new beta on Theano and discovered an interface change
>> that was not there in the beta 1.
>>
>> New behavior:
>> numpy.ndindex().next()
>> (0,)
>>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested this new beta on Theano and discovered an interface change
> that was not there in the beta 1.
>
> New behavior:
> numpy.ndindex().next()
> (0,)
>
> Old behavior:
> numpy.ndindex().next()
> ()
>
> This break some Theano c
Hi,
I tested this new beta on Theano and discovered an interface change
that was not there in the beta 1.
New behavior:
numpy.ndindex().next()
(0,)
Old behavior:
numpy.ndindex().next()
()
This break some Theano code that look like this:
import numpy
shape=()
out_shape=[12]
random_state=numpy.r
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Richard Hattersley
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [First of all - thanks to everyone involved in the 1.7 release. Especially
>>> Ondřej - it takes a
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Richard Hattersley
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [First of all - thanks to everyone involved in the 1.7 release. Especially
>> Ondřej - it takes a lot of time & energy to coordinate something like this.]
>>
>> Is the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Richard Hattersley
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [First of all - thanks to everyone involved in the 1.7 release. Especially
> Ondřej - it takes a lot of time & energy to coordinate something like this.]
>
> Is there an up to date release schedule anywhere? The trac milestone st
Hi,
[First of all - thanks to everyone involved in the 1.7 release. Especially
Ondřej - it takes a lot of time & energy to coordinate something like this.]
Is there an up to date release schedule anywhere? The trac milestone still
references June.
Regards,
Richard Hattersley
On 20 September 201
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second beta release of
NumPy 1.7.0b2.
Sources and binary installers can be found at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.0b2/
Please test this release and report any issues on the numpy-discussion
mailing list. Since beta1, we
18 matches
Mail list logo
