Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.0 [Problems on OS X w/ Python 2.6 and XCode 4]

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Andrew Jaffe wrote: > On 16/05/2011 18:45, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andrew Jaffe > > wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > I have OSX 10.6.7, XCode 4, and Python.org python 2.6.6 and 2.7.1, > whe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.0 [Problems on OS X w/ Python 2.6 and XCode 4]

On 16/05/2011 18:45, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andrew Jaffe > wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have OSX 10.6.7, XCode 4, and Python.org python 2.6.6 and 2.7.1, where > 2.7 is 64-bit. > > With 2.7, easy_install successfully compi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.0 [Problems on OS X w/ Python 2.6 and XCode 4]

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andrew Jaffe wrote: > Dear all, > > I have OSX 10.6.7, XCode 4, and Python.org python 2.6.6 and 2.7.1, where > 2.7 is 64-bit. > > With 2.7, easy_install successfully compiles and installs the package, > both over the web and with an explicit download. > > With 2.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.0 [Problems on OS X w/ Python 2.6 and XCode 4]

Dear all, I have OSX 10.6.7, XCode 4, and Python.org python 2.6.6 and 2.7.1, where 2.7 is 64-bit. With 2.7, easy_install successfully compiles and installs the package, both over the web and with an explicit download. With 2.6, there seems to be a problem with attempting to compile the PPC ar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.0

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.6.0. This release is the >> result of 9 months of work, and includes many new features, performance >> improvements

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.0

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.6.0. This release is the > result of 9 months of work, and includes many new features, performance > improvements and bug fixes. Some highlights are: > > - Re-introduction of datetime d

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.6.0

Hi, I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.6.0. This release is the result of 9 months of work, and includes many new features, performance improvements and bug fixes. Some highlights are: - Re-introduction of datetime dtype support to deal with dates in arrays. - A new 16-bit floati

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 3

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the third release candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. Compared to the second release candidate, two issues in f2py and one in loadtxt were fixed. If no new problems are reported, the final release will be in one week. Sources and binaries can be found at ht

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:00 AM, DJ Luscher wrote: > Pearu Peterson gmail.com> writes: > > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:18 PM, DJ Luscher lanl.gov> wrote: > > > > I have encountered another minor hangup. For assumed-shape array-valued > > functions defined within a fortran module there seems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

Pearu Peterson gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:18 PM, DJ Luscher lanl.gov> wrote: > > I have encountered another minor hangup.  For assumed-shape array-valued > functions defined within a fortran module there seems to be some trouble in > the autogenerated subroutine wrapper in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:18 PM, DJ Luscher wrote: > > I have encountered another minor hangup. For assumed-shape array-valued > functions defined within a fortran module there seems to be some trouble in > the > autogenerated subroutine wrapper interface. I think it has to do with the > order

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

Pearu Peterson gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:55 PM, DJ Luscher lanl.gov> wrote: > Pearu Peterson gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > Thanks for the bug report!These issues are now fixed in: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/f393b604  Ralf, feel free to apply this > changeset t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:55 PM, DJ Luscher wrote: > Pearu Peterson gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > Thanks for the bug report!These issues are now fixed in: > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/f393b604 Ralf, feel free to apply > this > changeset to 1.6.x branch if appropriate.Regards,Pearu >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

Pearu Peterson gmail.com> writes: > > > Thanks for the bug report!These issues are now fixed in:  https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/f393b604  Ralf, feel free to apply this changeset to 1.6.x branch if appropriate.Regards,Pearu > Excellent! Thank you. I'll cautiously add another concern

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:51 PM, DJ Luscher wrote: > > Ralf Gommers googlemail.com> writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. > > > > Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit > > Windows + M

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

Ralf Gommers googlemail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. > > Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit > Windows + MSVC) and several memory leaks were fixed. If no new > problems are rep

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release >> candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. >> >> Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit >> W

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. > > Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit > Windows + MSVC) and several memory leaks were fixed. If no new > problems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On 04.05.2011, at 8:42PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > == > FAIL: test_return_character.TestF90ReturnCharacter.test_all > -- > Traceback (most recent call last): > Fil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Ilan Schnell wrote: > I'm seeing these three failures on Solaris 5.10 (x86_64, using Python > 2.7.1): > > == > FAIL: Test basic arithmetic function errors >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Derek Homeier < > de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > >> Hi Ralf, >> >> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release >> > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. >> > >> > Compared to th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:24 PM, wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 5/3/2011 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Mac OS X 10.6.7 with macports python 2.7 I get as follows: OK (KNOWNFAIL=3, SKIP=1) Python version: Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Jan 12 2011, 10:44:27) [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)] on darwin % gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.5.3 "Well done" to everyone working on numpy 1.6! Paul

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. nanmin and nanmax are much faster in Numpy 1.6. Plus they now return an object that has dtype, etc attributes when the input is all NaN. Broke Bottle

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. > > > > Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit > > Windows + MSVC) a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 18:45, Keith Goodman wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release >> candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. > > I get one failure when I run from ipython but not python. In ipython I > import a few p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. I get one failure when I run from ipython but not python. In ipython I import a few packages at startup. One of those packages must be changing the n

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

Hi Ralf, > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. > > Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit > Windows + MSVC) and several memory leaks were fixed. If no new > problems are reported, the final release will be in one we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >> >> On 5/3/2011 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release >>> candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. >>> >>> Compared to the f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

I'm seeing these three failures on Solaris 5.10 (x86_64, using Python 2.7.1): == FAIL: Test basic arithmetic function errors -- Traceback (most recent call last):

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 5/3/2011 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release >> candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. >> >> Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit >> Windows + MSV

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

On 5/3/2011 11:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. > > Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit > Windows + MSVC) and several memory leaks were fixed. If no new > problems are repo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

In article , Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. >... > Sources and binaries can be found at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.6.0rc2/ > For (preliminary) release notes see below. Thanks!

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 2

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. Compared to the first release candidate, one segfault on (32-bit Windows + MSVC) and several memory leaks were fixed. If no new problems are reported, the final release will be in one week. Sources and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > I applied everything, since they're all obviously bugs and the fixes look > straightforward. I tested those commits on a few python/OS combinations, all looks good. So I'll try to tag an RC2 tonight. Ralf __

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

I applied everything, since they're all obviously bugs and the fixes look straightforward. -Mark On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I've found a few reference counting bugs running the regression tests > under Valgrind. Pull request here: > > https://github.com/numpy/n

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

I've found a few reference counting bugs running the regression tests under Valgrind. Pull request here: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/79 Mike On 04/30/2011 04:19 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/30/2011 9:27 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: >> >> >> >>On 4/30/2011 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 20

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On 4/30/2011 9:27 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Christoph Gohlke mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu>> wrote: On 4/30/2011 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Gohlke mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/30/2011 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4/30/2011 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On 4/30/2011 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > On 4/30/2011 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Charles R Harris > > mailto:charlesr.har

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> >> >> On 4/30/2011 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Charles R Harris >> > mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/30/2011 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Charles R Harris > > mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I get a null pointer access violation during nu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On 4/30/2011 4:58 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Charles R Harris > mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > I get a null pointer access violation during numpy.test() with all > msvc9/MKL builds for win32 (not win-amd64). The cra

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > >> I get a null pointer access violation during numpy.test() with all >> msvc9/MKL builds for win32 (not win-amd64). The crash occurs during >> test_result_type() in test_numeric.py and can be reduced to the >> following code: >> >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

> I get a null pointer access violation during numpy.test() with all > msvc9/MKL builds for win32 (not win-amd64). The crash occurs during > test_result_type() in test_numeric.py and can be reduced to the > following code: > > >>> import numpy as np > >>> np.result_type(np.array([np.float32(0)])

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

On 4/30/2011 1:19 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release > candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. If no new problems are reported, the final > release will be in one week. > > Sources and binaries can be found at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 release candidate 1

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of NumPy 1.6.0. If no new problems are reported, the final release will be in one week. Sources and binaries can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.6.0rc1/ For (preliminary) release notes see

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/11 10:33 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Did you mean to send this just to me? It seems like the whole is > generally interesting and helpful, at least to me... I did mean to send to the list -- I've done that now. > Well, the current code doesn't split on \r in py3k, admittedly that > must be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Sorry to keep harping on this, but for history's sake, I was one of the folks that got 'U' introduced in the first place. I was dealing with a nightmare of unix, mac and dos test files, 'U' was a godsend. On 4/5/11 4:51 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > The difference between 'rt' and 'U' is (this is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/2011 7:44 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Chris

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/2011 6:46 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > > > > > > ==

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > > > > > > ==

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/2011 4:05 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > == > FAIL: test_iterator.tes

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 4/5/11 3:36 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >>> I disagree that U makes no sense for binary file reading. > > I wasn't saying that it made no sense to have a "U" mode for binary file > reading, what I meant is that by the python2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/5/11 3:36 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >> I disagree that U makes no sense for binary file reading. I wasn't saying that it made no sense to have a "U" mode for binary file reading, what I meant is that by the python2 definition, it made no sense. In Python 2, the ONLY difference between

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > > A few numpy tests fail on win-amd64: > > > > == > FAIL: test_iterator.test_iter_broadcasting_errors > -

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Barker > wrote: >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >>>     IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes no >>>     sense when used with "b" for binary. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >>     IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes no >>     sense when used with "b" for binary. I looked at the code a ways back, >>     and I can't remember the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charle

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:45 AM, wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker < > chris.bar...@noaa.gov> > > wrote: > >> > >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> > IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker > wrote: >> >> On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >     IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes >> > no >> >     sense when used with "b" for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes > no > > sense when used with "b" for binary. I looked at the code a ways > back, > > and I can't remember t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/11 10:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > IIUC, "Ub" is undefined -- "U" means universal newlines, which makes no > sense when used with "b" for binary. I looked at the code a ways back, > and I can't remember the resolution order, but there isn't any checking > for incompatible

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

SUSE 11.3, python 2.7, gcc 4.3.4, gfortran from gcc 4.6.0, I get two failures on commit 1439a8ddcb2eda20fa102aa44e846783f29c0af3 (head of 1.6.x maintenance branch). --George. == FAIL: Test basic arithmetic function errors --

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > >> On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris >> >> >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py"

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > > >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", > >>> line 477, in open > >>> return _file_openers[ext](foun

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Superpack is OK on Windows Vista 64bit with Python 2.7 32bit. Alan Isaac Ran 2993 tests in 25.707s OK (KNOWNFAIL=9, SKIP=5) Running unit tests for numpy NumPy version 1.6.0b2 NumPy is installed in c:\Python27\lib\site-packages\numpy Python version 2.7 (r27:82525, Jul 4 2010, 09:01:59) [MSC v.150

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > > >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", > >>> line 477, in open > >>> return _file_openers[ext](foun

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", >>> line 477, in open >>> return _file_openers[ext](found, mode=mode) >>> IOError: invalid mode: Ub >>> >> >> Guess that w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy >> 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this >> release, the beta testing phase will last

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any problems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:03 AM, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> >>> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> >> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy >> > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive cha

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi all, On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any prob

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please test this beta and report any problems on the Numpy mailing list. Many bug fixes went in si

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to backport the following fixes to the 1.6.x branch for b2: > >        ef46a091 >        89db53b1 > > They're bugs in PEP 3118 format string generation, of the brown paper-pag > variety. Go ahead. For bug fixes I think you

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

Hi, I'd like to backport the following fixes to the 1.6.x branch for b2: ef46a091 89db53b1 They're bugs in PEP 3118 format string generation, of the brown paper-pag variety. Pauli ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

Ralf Gommers, on 2011-03-23 17:07, wrote: > Please test this beta and report any problems on the Numpy > mailing list. Hi, I reopened http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1768, as 'test_chisquare' still fails for me on a 32 bit machine. Lowering the precision from 14 to 13 decimals makes the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > In article > , >  Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy >> 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this >> release, the beta testing phase will last at lea

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

In article , Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any problems on th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > On 24.03.2011, at 9:11AM, Pearu Peterson wrote: > > > > Intel-64bit: > > ERROR: test_assumed_shape.TestAssumedShapeSumExample.test_all > > ---

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On 24.03.2011, at 9:11AM, Pearu Peterson wrote: > > Intel-64bit: > ERROR: test_assumed_shape.TestAssumedShapeSumExample.test_all > -- > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/sw/lib/python3.2/site-packages/nose/case.py", li

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Derek Homeier wrote: > Hi again, > > On 23 Mar 2011, at 17:07, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy >> 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this >> release, the beta testing phase will l

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Pearu Peterson wrote: > > Regarding this test failure, could you hack the > numpy/f2py/tests/test_kind.py script by adding the following code > > for i in range(20): > print '%s -> %s, %s' % (i, selected_real_kind(i), selectedrealkind(i)) > > and send me the out

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > On 24 Mar 2011, at 00:34, Derek Homeier wrote: > > > tests with the fink-installed pythons on MacOS X mostly succeeded, > > with one failure in python2.4 and a couple of issues seemingly > > related to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

On 24 Mar 2011, at 00:34, Derek Homeier wrote: > tests with the fink-installed pythons on MacOS X mostly succeeded, > with one failure in python2.4 and a couple of issues seemingly > related to PPC floating point accuracy, as below: > Probably last update for tonight: with the 'full' test suite,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

Hi again, On 23 Mar 2011, at 17:07, Ralf Gommers wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any pr

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 1

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please test this beta and report any problems on the Numpy mailing list. Sources and binaries can b