On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Richard Hattersley
> > wrote:
> >> So, assuming numpy.ndarray became a strict subclass of some new masked
> >> array, it looks plausible that adding just a few checks to
> numpy.n
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Richard Hattersley
> wrote:
>> So, assuming numpy.ndarray became a strict subclass of some new masked
>> array, it looks plausible that adding just a few checks to numpy.ndarray to
>> exclude the masked superclass would prevent much downst
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Richard Hattersley
wrote:
> So, assuming numpy.ndarray became a strict subclass of some new masked
> array, it looks plausible that adding just a few checks to numpy.ndarray to
> exclude the masked superclass would prevent much downstream code from
> accidentally o
On 27 April 2012 17:42, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> 1) There is a lot of code out there that does not know anything about
> masks and is not used to checking for masks.It enlarges the basic
> abstraction in a way that is not backwards compatible *conceptually*.
> This smells fishy to me and I
On Apr 25, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Hattersley wrote:
> The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting topics
> - too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't spotted
> yet. Perhaps that's because it's flat out wrong, or crazy, or just too
> awkwar
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:16 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Charles R Harris
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The masked array discus
Hi all,
Thanks for all your responses and for your patience with a newcomer. Don't
worry - I'm not going to give up yet. It's all just part of my learning the
ropes.
On 27 April 2012 14:05, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Your idea is interesting, but doesn't it require C++? Or maybe you
> are thinking
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
>>> topics - too many
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley > wrote:
>
>> The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
>> topics - too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't
>> spotted yet. Per
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Richard Hattersley
wrote:
> The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
> topics - too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't
> spotted yet. Perhaps that's because it's flat out wrong, or crazy, or just
> too awkward
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Richard Hattersley
wrote:
> I know used a somewhat jokey tone in my original posting, but fundamentally
> it was a serious question concerning a live topic. So I'm curious about the
> lack of response. Has this all been covered before?
>
> Sorry if I'm being too i
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Richard Hattersley
wrote:
> I know used a somewhat jokey tone in my original posting, but
> fundamentally it was a serious question concerning a live topic. So I'm
> curious about the lack of response. Has this all been covered before?
>
> Sorry if I'm being too im
I know used a somewhat jokey tone in my original posting, but fundamentally
it was a serious question concerning a live topic. So I'm curious about the
lack of response. Has this all been covered before?
Sorry if I'm being too impatient!
On 25 April 2012 16:58, Richard Hattersley wrote:
> The
The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
topics - too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't
spotted yet. Perhaps that's because it's flat out wrong, or crazy, or just
too awkward to be helpful. But ...
Shouldn't masked arrays (MA) be a superclas
14 matches
Mail list logo
