Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

I had to move my development enviroment on different windows box recently (stilll in progress). On this box I don't have full access unfortunately. The patch for scipy build was merged into scipy master some time ago, see https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/3484 . I have some additional patches for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-28 15:25 GMT+02:00 Carl Kleffner : > Hi, > > on https://bitbucket.org/carlkl/mingw-w64-for-python/downloads I uploaded > 7z-archives for mingw-w64 and for OpenBLAS-0.2.10 for 32 bit and for 64 bit. > To use mingw-w64 for Python >= 3.3 you have to manually tweak the so called > specs file -

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, on https://bitbucket.org/carlkl/mingw-w64-for-python/downloads I uploaded 7z-archives for mingw-w64 and for OpenBLAS-0.2.10 for 32 bit and for 64 bit. To use mingw-w64 for Python >= 3.3 you have to manually tweak the so called specs file - see readme.txt in the archive. Regards Carl 2014-

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

I forked Olivier's example project to use the same infrastructure for building conda binaries and deploying them to binstar, which might also be useful for some projects. https://github.com/rmcgibbo/python-appveyor-conda-example -Robert On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert McGibbon wrote: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-10 0:53 GMT+02:00 Robert McGibbon : > This is an awesome resource for tons of projects. Thanks. FYI here is the PR for sklearn to use AppVeyor CI: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/3363 It's slightly different from the minimalistic sample I wrote for python-appveyor-de

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

This is an awesome resource for tons of projects. Thanks Olivier! -Robert On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > Feodor updated the AppVeyor nodes to have the Windows SDK matching > MSVC 2008 Express for Python 2. I have updated my sample scripts and > we now have a working e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Feodor updated the AppVeyor nodes to have the Windows SDK matching MSVC 2008 Express for Python 2. I have updated my sample scripts and we now have a working example of a free CI system for: Python 2 and 3 both for 32 and 64 bit architectures. https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo Best

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi! I gave appveyor a try this WE so as to build a minimalistic Python 3 project with a Cython extension. It works both with 32 and 64 bit MSVC++ and can generate wheel packages. See: https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo However 2008 is not (yet) installed so it cannot be used for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > I can make it in the late evening (MEZ timezone), so you have to wait a bit > ... I also will try to create new numpy/scipy wheels. I now have the latest > OpenBLAS version ready. Olivier gaves me access to rackspace. I w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi Matthew, I can make it in the late evening (MEZ timezone), so you have to wait a bit ... I also will try to create new numpy/scipy wheels. I now have the latest OpenBLAS version ready. Olivier gaves me access to rackspace. I wil try it out on the weekend. Regards Carl 2014-07-03 12:46 GMT

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

I guess this one's mainly for Carl: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Sturla Molden wrote: >> On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: >> >>> >>> Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should >>> be SSE2 -- I":d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Sturla Molden wrote: > On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: > >> >> Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should >> be SSE2 -- I":d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to >> go through some hoops that n have most peop

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On 03.07.2014 05:56, Sturla Molden wrote: > On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: > >> >> Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should >> be SSE2 -- I":d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to >> go through some hoops that n have most people get something

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: > > Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should > be SSE2 -- I":d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to > go through some hoops that n have most people get something that is > "much slower than MATLAB". I think we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > > Having a noSSE channel would make sense. > > Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should be SSE2 -- I":d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to go through some hoops that n have most people get som

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > It looks like > 99% of Windows users do have SSE2 though [1]. So I think what is > required is > > * Build the wheels for 32-bit (easy) > * Patch the wheels to check and give helpful error in absence of SSE2 > (fairly easy) > * Get agreemen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi, > > personally I don't have a preference of Binstar over somewhere.org. More > important is that one has to agree where to find the binaries. Binstar has > the concept of channels and allow wheels. So one could provide a channel for >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, personally I don't have a preference of Binstar over somewhere.org. More important is that one has to agree where to find the binaries. Binstar has the concept of channels and allow wheels. So one could provide a channel for NOSSE and more channels for other specialized builds: ATLAS/OpenBLAS/

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi Carl, All the items you suggest would be very appreciated. Don't hesitate to ping me if you need me to test new packages. Also the sklearn project has a free Rackspace Cloud account that Matthew is already using to make travis upload OSX wheels for the master branch of various scipy stack proj

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi, > > The mingw-w64 based wheels (Atlas and openBLAS) are based on a patched numpy > version, that hasn't been published as numpy pull for revision until now (my > failure). I could try to do this tomorrow in the evening. That would b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, The mingw-w64 based wheels (Atlas and openBLAS) are based on a patched numpy version, that hasn't been published as numpy pull for revision until now (my failure). I could try to do this tomorrow in the evening. Another important point is, that the toolchain, that is capable to compile numpy/s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Carl Kleffner wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I do regulary builds for python-2.7. Due to my limited resources I didn't >> build for 3.3 or 3.4 right now. I didn't updated my toolchhain from >> february,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi all, > > I do regulary builds for python-2.7. Due to my limited resources I didn't > build for 3.3 or 3.4 right now. I didn't updated my toolchhain from > february, but I do regulary builds of OpenBLAS. OpenBLAS is under heavy > devel

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi all, I do regulary builds for python-2.7. Due to my limited resources I didn't build for 3.3 or 3.4 right now. I didn't updated my toolchhain from february, but I do regulary builds of OpenBLAS. OpenBLAS is under heavy development right now, thanks to Werner Saar, see: https://github.com/wernsa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi Matthew and Ralf, Has anyone managed to build working whl packages for numpy and scipy on win32 using the static mingw-w64 toolchain? -- Olivier ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/nump

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:06 AM, David Cournapeau > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Julian Taylor > > wrote: > >> > >> On 09.05.2014 12:42, David Cournapeau wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, May 9, 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:06 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Julian Taylor > wrote: >> >> On 09.05.2014 12:42, David Cournapeau wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthew Brett > > > wrote: >> > >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> >>> Aha, >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

this is from: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built-in-Functions.html // ifunc resolvers fire before constructors, explicitly call the init function. __builtin_cpu_init (); if (__builtin_cpu_supports ("ssse2")) else Cheers, Carl 2014-05-09 13:06 GMT+02:00 David Courna

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 09.05.2014 12:42, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 P

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On 09.05.2014 12:42, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, David Cournapeau > mailto:courn...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Ap

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, David Cournapeau > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett > > > wrote: > >> > >> Aha, > >> > >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett > > >> wrote: > >> > Hi,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On 09/05/14 02:51, Matthew Brett wrote: > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Window-versions > > Firefox crash reports now have about 1 percent of machines without > SSE2. I suspect that people running new installs of numpy will have > slightly better machines on average than Firefox users, but

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Aha, >> >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner >> > wrote: >> >> A possible

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Correction: gcc (mingw) runtimes are statically linked. The C-runtime DLL msvcrXXX is linked dynamically. Carl 2014-04-29 17:10 GMT+02:00 Sturla Molden : > Matthew Brett wrote: > > > 2) Static linking - Carl's toolchain does full static linking > > including C runtimes > > The C runtime canno

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Matthew Brett wrote: > 2) Static linking - Carl's toolchain does full static linking > including C runtimes The C runtime cannot be statically linked. It would mean that we get multiple copies of errno and multiple malloc heaps in the process – one of each static CRT. We must use the same C runt

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

(1) Yes, Support for MSVC100 (python-3.3 and up) is on the TODO list (2) both toolchains are configured for static linking. No need to deploy: libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll, libgomp-1.dll, libquadmath-0.dll, libstdc++-6.dll, libgfortran-3.dll or libwinpthread-1.dll (3) I decided to create two dedicated

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> As you know, I'm really hoping it will be possible make a devkit for >> Python similar to the Ruby devkits [1]. > > > That would be great! > > From a really quick glance, it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Aha, > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner > wrote: > >> A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and > to > >> deploy it as PYP

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On 28/04/14 18:21, Ralf Gommers wrote: > No problems thus far, but I only installed it yesterday. :-) > > > Sounds good. Let's give it a bit more time, once you've given it a good > workout we can add that those gfortran 4.8.x compilers seem to work fine > to the scipy build instructions. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > As you know, I'm really hoping it will be possible make a devkit for > Python similar to the Ruby devkits [1]. > That would be great! >From a really quick glance, it looks like we could almost use the Ruby Devkit, maybe adding a couple add-

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Ralf Gommers wrote: > Sounds good. Let's give it a bit more time, once you've given it a good > workout we can add that those gfortran 4.8.x compilers seem to work fine to > the scipy build instructions. Yes, it needs to be tested properly. The build instructions for OS X Mavericks should also

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Sturla Molden wrote: > Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > I'd be interested to hear if those work well for you. For people that > just > > want to get things working, I would recommend to use the gfortran > > installers recommended at > > > href=" > http://scipy.org/scipy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Ralf Gommers wrote: > I'd be interested to hear if those work well for you. For people that just > want to get things working, I would recommend to use the gfortran > installers recommended at > href="http://scipy.org/scipylib/building/macosx.html#compilers-c-c-fortran-cython.";>http://scipy.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Sturla Molden wrote: > Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > > Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic. OSX > > is somewhat saner in this respect. > > Oh yes, it seems there are official "unofficial gfortran binaries" > available for OSX: > > http:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Aha, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: >> A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to >> deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could >> be extended d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic. OSX > is somewhat saner in this respect. Oh yes, it seems there are official "unofficial gfortran binaries" available for OSX: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries#MacOS Cool :) Sturla __

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to > deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain > could be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea, whats > the best strateg

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to > deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could > be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea, whats the best > str

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea, whats the best strategy to additionaly install ATLAS or other third party libraries.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi, > > I will definitly don't have not time until thursday this week working out > the github workflow for a numpy pull request. So feel free to do it for me. OK - I will have a go at this tomorrow. > BTW: There is a missing feature i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, I will definitly don't have not time until thursday this week working out the github workflow for a numpy pull request. So feel free to do it for me. BTW: There is a missing feature in the mingw-w64 toolchain. By now it features linking to msvcrt90 runtime only. I have do extend the specs fil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Hi, > > 25.04.2014 00:56, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's > toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley >> (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy >> wheels for testing. > > Where can I get yo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, 25.04.2014 00:56, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley > (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy > wheels for testing. Where can I get your numpy.patch scipy.patch and what's in them? Cheers,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi Carl, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Carl Kleffner wrote: > Hi, > > basically the toolchain was created with a local fork of the "mingw-builds" > build process along with some addons and patches. It is NOT a mingw-w64 > fork. BTW: there are numerous mingw-w64 based toolchains out there, mos

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, basically the toolchain was created with a local fork of the "mingw-builds" build process along with some addons and patches. It is NOT a mingw-w64 fork. BTW: there are numerous mingw-w64 based toolchains out there, most of them build without any information about the build process and patches

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

25.04.2014 08:57, Sturla Molden kirjoitti: [clip] > On the positive side: Does this mean we finally can use gfortran on > Windows? And if so, can we use Fortran versions beyond Fortran 77 in SciPy > now? Or is Mac OS X a blocker? Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Matthew Brett wrote: > Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley > (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy > wheels for testing. Thanks for your great effort to solve this mess. By Murphy's law, I do not have access to a Windows computer on wh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:20 AM, wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:10 AM, wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: >>> >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:10 AM, wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Har

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley >> (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy >> wheels for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris < >>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrot

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

> > > OT: Oh, I hate pip and packages that require numpy E:\tmp>C:\Python27\python C:\Python27\Scripts\pip-script.py install -U patsy Downloading/unpacking patsy Running setup.py (path:c:\users\josef\appdata\local\temp\pip_build_josef\patsy\setup.py) egg_info for package patsy no previous

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Matthew, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett >>> wrote

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi Matthew, >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Cli

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:08 PM, wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi Matthew, >> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Cli

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley >> (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy >> wheels for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Cool. After all these long years... Now all we need is a box running tests > for CI. There is http://www.appveyor.com/ though I haven't tried doing anything with it yet... (yes it says ".NET" at the top, but then at the bottom it says

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi Matthew, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley > (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy > wheels for testing. > > The build uses Carl's custom mingw-w64 build with static li

[Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

Hi, Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy wheels for testing. The build uses Carl's custom mingw-w64 build with static linking. There are two harmless test failures on scipy (being discussed on the li