Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Mi, 2014-04-23 at 10:11 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Berg > > wrote: > > > On Di, 2014-04-22 at 15:35 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> > > >> I'd like to bra

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

On Mi, 2014-04-23 at 10:11 -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Berg > wrote: > > On Di, 2014-04-22 at 15:35 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> > >> I'd like to branch 1.9.x at the end of the month. There are a couple > >> of reasons fo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > *Datetime timezone handling broken in > 1.7.x* > > I don't think there is time to get this done for 1.9.0 and it needs to be > pushed off to 1.10.0. > > *

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Di, 2014-04-22 at 15:35 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> I'd like to branch 1.9.x at the end of the month. There are a couple >> of reasons for the timing. First, we have a lot of new stuff in the >> development branch.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

On Di, 2014-04-22 at 15:35 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > > I'd like to branch 1.9.x at the end of the month. There are a couple > of reasons for the timing. First, we have a lot of new stuff in the > development branch. Second, there is work ongoing in masked arrays > that I'd like

[Numpy-discussion] 1.9.x branch

Hi All, I'd like to branch 1.9.x at the end of the month. There are a couple of reasons for the timing. First, we have a lot of new stuff in the development branch. Second, there is work ongoing in masked arrays that I'd like to keep out of the release so that it has more time to settle. Third, it