Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.0 release runup

2014-03-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On So, 2014-03-23 at 07:26 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Ralf Gommers > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Charles R Harris > > wrote: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.0 release runup

2014-03-23 Thread Sebastian Berg
On So, 2014-03-23 at 07:26 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > Hi All, > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.0 release runup

2014-03-23 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> It is time to start looking forward to the 1.9.0 release. Currently there >> are some 76 open PRs and they keep rolling in, which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.9.0 release runup

2014-03-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > It is time to start looking forward to the 1.9.0 release. Currently there > are some 76 open PRs and they keep rolling in, which is good, > To make the PR list a bit more manageable, I would suggest to start closing the ones

[Numpy-discussion] 1.9.0 release runup

2014-03-22 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, It is time to start looking forward to the 1.9.0 release. Currently there are some 76 open PRs and they keep rolling in, which is good, but we need to decide on what is important for 1.9 and what can be put off to 1.10 because otherwise we will never finish. The datetime problems and some