On 06.03.2014 19:46, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should [1] be considered a release blocker for 1.8.1?
>
> Skipper
>
> [1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4442
as far as I can tell its a regression of the 1.8.0 release but not the
1.8.1 release so I wouldn't consider it a blocker.
Bu
Hi,
Should [1] be considered a release blocker for 1.8.1?
Skipper
[1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4442
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 26 February 2014 22:48, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
> In that case, the OSX instructions could (within the next few months)
> be as simple as:
>
> Install python from binary installer at python.org
> curl -O https://raw.github.com/pypa/pip/master/contrib/get-pip.py
> python get-pip.py
> pip install
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Tom Augspurger
wrote:
> Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote
> > What python are you using? apparently not a Universal 32+64 bit build.
> The
> > one Apple delivers?
>
> I'm using homebrew python, so the platform difference seems to have come
> from there.
and it _s
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> > Agreed. The trick is that it's reasonable for users of Apple's python
> build
> > to want this too -- but I don't know how we can hope to provide that.
>
> We don't support system python for the mpkg, so I think it's
> reasonable to leave t
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Tom Augspurger
wrote:
> Thanks Chris,
>
>
> Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote
>> What python are you using? apparently not a Universal 32+64 bit build. The
>> one Apple delivers?
>
> I'm using homebrew python, so the platform difference seems to have come
> fr
Thanks Chris,
Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote
> What python are you using? apparently not a Universal 32+64 bit build. The
> one Apple delivers?
I'm using homebrew python, so the platform difference seems to have come
from there. I agree about renaming the file as not being a real solution.
I'
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > - convention is the other option:
>> > - use binary wheel for in-house deplyment to similar systems
>> > - use binary wheels for a well-defined python build:
>>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> > - convention is the other option:
> > - use binary wheel for in-house deplyment to similar systems
> > - use binary wheels for a well-defined python build:
> >- for PyPi, that's the python.org builds for Windows and OS-
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Tom Augspurger
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for posting those wheels Matthew.
>>
>> I'm on a Mac (10.9.2) and I had trouble installing numpy from your wheel
>> in
>> a fresh virtualenv with the latests pip, set
Hi,
Arnaud finished that in a different way then we had discussed in the PR.
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4081
Fred
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a PR that fix way too much printing to stdout when finding the
> blas linking information:
>
> h
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Tom Augspurger
wrote:
> Thanks for posting those wheels Matthew.
>
> I'm on a Mac (10.9.2) and I had trouble installing numpy from your wheel in
> a fresh virtualenv with the latests pip, setuptools, and wheel.
>
> ```
> $pip install
> ~/Downloads/numpy-1.8.0.dev_a
Thanks for posting those wheels Matthew.
I'm on a Mac (10.9.2) and I had trouble installing numpy from your wheel in
a fresh virtualenv with the latests pip, setuptools, and wheel.
```
$pip install
~/Downloads/numpy-1.8.0.dev_a89a36e-cp27-none-macosx_10_9_intel.whl
numpy-1.8.0.dev_a89a36e-cp27-n
Hi,
I have a PR that fix way too much printing to stdout when finding the
blas linking information:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4081
This was created by change in NumPy. I was requested as a comment to
put the removed information in the dict that we return to the user. I
won't have the
I build wheels for 32bit and 64bit (Windows, OpenBLAS) and put them here:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B4DmELLTwYmlX05WSWpYVWJfRjg&usp=sharing
Due to shortage of time I give not much more detailed informations before
1st of March.
Carl
2014-02-25 1:53 GMT+01:00 Chris Barker :
> What'
When will we see a
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.1/Changelog/download
changelog?
I'd like to get this into our organization's SRS, and a list of fixes
(related or not) would be great.
- Ray
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumP
What's up with the OpenBLAS work?
Any chance that might make it into official binaries? Or is is just too
fresh?
Also -- from an off-hand comment in the thread is looked like OpenBLAS
could provide a library that selects for optimized code at run-time
depending on hardware -- this would solve the
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> A lot of fixes have gone into the 1.8.x branch and it looks about time to do
>> a bugfix release. There are a couple of important bugfixes still to
>>
I am pretty sure that you guys test pandas master
but 1.8.1 looks good to me
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, RayS wrote:
>> Has anyone alerted C Gohlke?
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#numpy
>>
>> - Ray
>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:54 PM, RayS wrote:
> Has anyone alerted C Gohlke?
> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#numpy
>
> - Ray
>
Christolph seems to keep a pretty good eye on numpy and we rely on him to
test it on windows. In anycase, there are enough fixes backported, that I
think we
Has anyone alerted C Gohlke?
http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#numpy
- Ray
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A lot of fixes have gone into the 1.8.x branch and it looks about time to do
> a bugfix release. There are a couple of important bugfixes still to
> backport, but if all goes well next weekend, March 1, looks like a good
Hi All,
A lot of fixes have gone into the 1.8.x branch and it looks about time to
do a bugfix release. There are a couple of important bugfixes still to
backport, but if all goes well next weekend, March 1, looks like a good
target date. So give the current 1.8.x branch a try so as to check that i
23 matches
Mail list logo
