Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release update

2013-06-02 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Most of the PR's that were mentioned as desirable for the 1.8 release have > been merged, or look to be merged in the next week or two. The current list > of > blockers

[Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release update

2013-05-31 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Most of the PR's that were mentioned as desirable for the 1.8 release have been merged, or look to be merged in the next week or two. The current list of blockersdoesn't look to severe to me but I suspect that it is inco

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-29 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > > It would be good to get the utc-everywhere fix for datetime64 in there if someone has time to look into it. >>> I'll see if I can open an issue for the "easy" fix. > > DONE: Issue #3290

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-29 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It would be good to get the utc-everywhere fix for datetime64 in there if >>> someone has time to look into it. >>> >>> +1 >> >> I've been on vacation, so haven't written up the various notes and >> comments

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I think it is time to start the runup to the 1.8 release. I don't know of >> any outstanding blockers but if anyone has a PR/issue

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Dave Hirschfeld < > dave.hirschf...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi All,I think it is time to start the runup to the 1.8 release. I don't >> know of any outstanding blockers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-29 Thread Benjamin Root
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I think it is time to start the runup to the 1.8 release. I don't know of > any outstanding blockers but if anyone has a PR/issue that they feel needs > to be in the next Numpy release now is the t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-29 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Dave Hirschfeld wrote: > > Hi All,I think it is time to start the runup to the 1.8 release. I don't > know of any outstanding blockers but if anyone has a PR/issue that they > feel > needs to be in the next Numpy release now is the time to make it > known.Chuck > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-25 Thread Jay Bourque
I would love to get the following pull requests of mine merged in: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2822 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/462 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/359 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2821 The last one probably requires a bit more work, but I'm still waitin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-25 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 09:16 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I think it is time to start the runup to the 1.8 release. I don't know > of any outstanding blockers but if anyone has a PR/issue that they > feel needs to be in the next Numpy release now is the time to make it > known. Sou

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-25 Thread Dave Hirschfeld
Charles R Harris gmail.com> writes: > > Hi All,I think it is time to start the runup to the 1.8 release. I don't know of any outstanding blockers but if anyone has a PR/issue that they feel needs to be in the next Numpy release now is the time to make it known.Chuck > It would be good to get

[Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-04-25 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I think it is time to start the runup to the 1.8 release. I don't know of any outstanding blockers but if anyone has a PR/issue that they feel needs to be in the next Numpy release now is the time to make it known. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mai

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-14 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote: > I don't volontear for the next release manager, but +1 for shorter > releases. I heard just good comments from that. Also, I'm not sure it > would ask more from the release manager. Do someone have an idea? The > most work I do as a releas

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:19 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris > > wrote: > >> Now that 1.7 is nearing release, it's time to look forward to the 1.8 > >> release. I'd like us to get back to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-14 Thread Frédéric Bastien
Hi, I don't volontear for the next release manager, but +1 for shorter releases. I heard just good comments from that. Also, I'm not sure it would ask more from the release manager. Do someone have an idea? The most work I do as a release manager for theano is the preparation/tests/release notes a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-14 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:19 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> Now that 1.7 is nearing release, it's time to look forward to the 1.8 >>> release. I'd like us to get back t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-14 Thread Phil Elson
I tried to suggest this for our matplotlib development cycle, but it didn't get the roaring response I was hoping for (even though I was being conservative by suggesting a 8-9 month release time): http://matplotlib.1069221.n5.nabble.com/strategy-for-1-2-x-master-PEP8-changes-tp39453p39465.html In

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-13 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> Now that 1.7 is nearing release, it's time to look forward to the 1.8 >> release. I'd like us to get back to the twice yearly schedule that we tried >> to maintain through the 1

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-13 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Now that 1.7 is nearing release, it's time to look forward to the 1.8 > > release. I'd like us to get back to the twice yearly schedule that we > tried > > to maintain through

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-13 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Now that 1.7 is nearing release, it's time to look forward to the 1.8 > release. I'd like us to get back to the twice yearly schedule that we tried > to maintain through the 1.3 - 1.6 releases, so I propose a June release as a > goal. Call

[Numpy-discussion] 1.8 release

2013-01-13 Thread Charles R Harris
Now that 1.7 is nearing release, it's time to look forward to the 1.8 release. I'd like us to get back to the twice yearly schedule that we tried to maintain through the 1.3 - 1.6 releases, so I propose a June release as a goal. Call it the Spring Cleaning release. As to content, I'd like to see th