Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.5.x branched

2010-07-18 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 7/18/2010 7:52 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:13:43 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: > [clip] >> Builds fine on OS X 10.6 with both 2.7 and 3.1, and all tests pass. With >> one exception: in-place build for 3.1 is broken. Does anyone know is >> this is a distutils or numpy issue? Th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.5.x branched

2010-07-18 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:13:43 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: [clip] > Builds fine on OS X 10.6 with both 2.7 and 3.1, and all tests pass. With > one exception: in-place build for 3.1 is broken. Does anyone know is > this is a distutils or numpy issue? The problem is that on import > numpy.__config__ can no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.5.x branched

2010-07-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Based on patches contributed by Christoph Gohlke, I've created a branch >> for 1.5.x: >> >>http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/branches/1.5.x >> >> It sh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.5.x branched

2010-07-17 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Dear all, > > Based on patches contributed by Christoph Gohlke, I've created a branch > for 1.5.x: > >http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/branches/1.5.x > > It should be > > a) Binary compatible with Numpy 1.4 on Python 2.x. > > Th

[Numpy-discussion] 1.5.x branched

2010-07-17 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Dear all, Based on patches contributed by Christoph Gohlke, I've created a branch for 1.5.x: http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/branches/1.5.x It should be a) Binary compatible with Numpy 1.4 on Python 2.x. This meant rolling back the datetime and a couple other changes. b) Supp