Hi All,
I plan to branch the 1.10 release next Monday. I expect this to be a
difficult release, much time has passed since 1.9 and there have been
significant enhancements/changes to masked arrays, structured array
assigment, and recored arrays. In addition, most ufuncs no longer return
`NotImplem
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2015 2:01 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote:
> >
> > There are too many PRs marked as "1.10 blockers", I think the only real
> blockers are:
> > - __numpy_ufunc__ PRs (#4815, #4855)
>
> The main blocker here is figuring out how to coordin
On Apr 6, 2015 2:01 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote:
>
> There are too many PRs marked as "1.10 blockers", I think the only real
blockers are:
> - __numpy_ufunc__ PRs (#4815, #4855)
The main blocker here is figuring out how to coordinate __numpy_ufunc__ and
__binop__ dispatch, e.g. PR #5748. We need to
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10.
>>
>
> Good idea. If you're going to do this, it may be helpful to create a new
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10.
>
Good idea. If you're going to do this, it may be helpful to create a new
1.10 milestone and keep but clean up the "1.10 blockers" milestone so there
are only real blockers
Hi All,
I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10. If there is something
that you want to have in the release, please mention it here by PR #.I
think new enhancement PR's should be considered for 1.11 rather than 1.10,
but bug fixes will go in. There is some flexibility, of course, as th