[Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release

2015-06-17 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I plan to branch the 1.10 release next Monday. I expect this to be a difficult release, much time has passed since 1.9 and there have been significant enhancements/changes to masked arrays, structured array assigment, and recored arrays. In addition, most ufuncs no longer return `NotImplem

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release again.

2015-04-06 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Apr 6, 2015 2:01 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: > > > > There are too many PRs marked as "1.10 blockers", I think the only real > blockers are: > > - __numpy_ufunc__ PRs (#4815, #4855) > > The main blocker here is figuring out how to coordin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release again.

2015-04-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Apr 6, 2015 2:01 PM, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: > > There are too many PRs marked as "1.10 blockers", I think the only real blockers are: > - __numpy_ufunc__ PRs (#4815, #4855) The main blocker here is figuring out how to coordinate __numpy_ufunc__ and __binop__ dispatch, e.g. PR #5748. We need to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release again.

2015-04-06 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10. >> > > Good idea. If you're going to do this, it may be helpful to create a new

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release again.

2015-04-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10. > Good idea. If you're going to do this, it may be helpful to create a new 1.10 milestone and keep but clean up the "1.10 blockers" milestone so there are only real blockers

[Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release again.

2015-04-06 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10. If there is something that you want to have in the release, please mention it here by PR #.I think new enhancement PR's should be considered for 1.11 rather than 1.10, but bug fixes will go in. There is some flexibility, of course, as th