On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Should we disable the warning for the tests? It's a bit unnerving and
>> likely to generate mail calling attention to it.
>
> I don't have a problem with that. Is there some kind of trapping mechanism we
> can use ?
You can
> Should we disable the warning for the tests? It's a bit unnerving and
> likely to generate mail calling attention to it.
I don't have a problem with that. Is there some kind of trapping mechanism we
can use ? A la "fail_unless_raise" ?
___
Numpy-disc
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we disable the warning for the tests? It's a bit unnerving and likely
> to generate mail calling attention to it.
+1
I tend to agree that it is disconcerting to have warnings pop up in the tests.
--
Jarrod Millm
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we disable the warning for the tests? It's a bit unnerving and likely
> to generate mail calling attention to it.
Yes. Known warnings should be explicitly silenced in tests.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to beli
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008 17:57:30 Charles R Harris wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Charles R Harris
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Charles R Harris <
> > >
> > > [EMAI
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 17:57:30 Charles R Harris wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Charles R Harris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Charles R Harris <
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Alan McIntyre
> >> <[EMAIL
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Charles R Harris <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Pierr
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 11:39:32 Alan McIntyre wrote:
>>
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 11:39:32 Alan McIntyre wrote:
> >> There's some commentary and a patch on NumPy ticket 793 on this issue:
> >>
> >> http:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008 11:39:32 Alan McIntyre wrote:
>> There's some commentary and a patch on NumPy ticket 793 on this issue:
>>
>> http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/793
>
> OK, thanks a lot ! That's a C problem, then...
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 11:39:32 Alan McIntyre wrote:
> There's some commentary and a patch on NumPy ticket 793 on this issue:
>
> http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/793
OK, thanks a lot ! That's a C problem, then...
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
N
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The problem looks quite recent, and not related to numpy.ma itself: what
>> changed recently in the .tolist() method of ndarrays ? Why do we get t
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
> Most of the errors that are reported in 1.1.0rc1 are related to the
> .tolist()
> method in numpy.ma, such as :
>
> ERROR: Tests fields retrieval
> --
All,
Most of the errors that are reported in 1.1.0rc1 are related to the .tolist()
method in numpy.ma, such as :
ERROR: Tests fields retrieval
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"C:\Apps\Py
14 matches
Mail list logo