Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Stefan, >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: >> >>> Hi Chuck >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Charles

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-02 Thread Benjamin Root
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > >> Hi Chuck >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> >> I'll bet the skimage problems come from >> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-02 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi Stefan, On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > Hi Chuck > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > >> I'll bet the skimage problems come from > >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3811. They may be doing something > >> naughty... > >> > > > > Rev

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-02 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
Hi Chuck On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> I'll bet the skimage problems come from >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3811. They may be doing something >> naughty... >> > > Reverting that commit fixes those skimage failures. However, there are a > number of python2.7

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Kern
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:52:06PM +0100, Robert Kern wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > 01.10.2013 16:28, Jack Howarth kirjoitti: > > > [clip] > > > > /sw/bin/python2.7 setup.py buil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Kern
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > Hi, > > 01.10.2013 16:28, Jack Howarth kirjoitti: > [clip] > > /sw/bin/python2.7 setup.py build > > > > which fails at... > > > > /sw/bin/gfortran -Wall -L/sw/lib build/temp.macosx-10.6-x86_64-2.7/numpy/linalg/lapack_litemodule.o build/temp

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-01 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke > >> wrote: > >> > 2) Bottleneck 0.7.0 > >> > > >> > > http

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke >> wrote: >> > 2) Bottleneck 0.7.0 >> > >> > https://github.com/kwgoodman/bottleneck/issues/71#issuecomment-25331701 >> >> I c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-01 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > 2) Bottleneck 0.7.0 > > > > https://github.com/kwgoodman/bottleneck/issues/71#issuecomment-25331701 > > I can't tell if these are real bugs in numpy, or tests checking that >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > 2) Bottleneck 0.7.0 > > https://github.com/kwgoodman/bottleneck/issues/71#issuecomment-25331701 I can't tell if these are real bugs in numpy, or tests checking that bottleneck is bug-for-bug compatible with old numpy and we just fixed so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-10-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: >>> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke >> >> > wrote: >>> >> > NumPy 1.8.0rc1 looks good. All tests pass on Windows and >>> >> most >>> >> 3rd party >>> >> > packages test OK no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: >> > On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > > On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Ch

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: >> >> On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Julian Taylor
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: > > > > On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do > actually test this! It is really in your best > > interest, and I think p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> >> >> On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do >> actually test this! It is really in your best >> > interest, and I think people don't always r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do > actually test this! It is really in your best > > interest, and I think people don't always realize this. > > > > Here's how it works: > > - If you test it *now*, and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:> Everyone please do actually test this! It is really in your best > interest, and I think people don't always realize this. > > Here's how it works: > - If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7, > and you *tell* us this now,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] 1.8.0rc1

2013-09-30 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Everyone please do actually test this! It is really in your best interest, and I think people don't always realize this. Here's how it works: - If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7, and you *tell* us this now, then it's *our* problem and we hold up the release to fix