Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here's a first draft of a governance document for NumPy.
>>
>> Thanks for this.
>>
>>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here's a first draft of a governance document for NumPy.
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> I wasn't sure from your email whether you were asking for feedback as
> to whe
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a first draft of a governance document for NumPy.
Thanks for this.
I wasn't sure from your email whether you were asking for feedback as
to whether this was the right governance model?
I mean that - for code - I t
Hi all,
Here's a first draft of a governance document for NumPy.
A few people have seen sneak peeks and have suggested possibly
reorganizing it either by taking some of the "how consensus works"
stuff out into a separate document, or alternatively keeping that
stuff in the foreground and moving s
