Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

On Jan 26, 2008 1:05 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 25, 2008 11:30 PM, David Cournapeau > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It varies wit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Jan 25, 2008 11:30 PM, David Cournapeau > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > It varies with the Linux distro. The usual convention (LSB, I think) > > uses /usr/local/lib64, but Debia

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

On Jan 25, 2008 11:30 PM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > It varies with the Linux distro. The usual convention (LSB, I think) > > uses /usr/local/lib64, but Debian and distros derived from Debian use > > /usr/local/lib instead. That's how it was

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Jan 25, 2008 3:21 AM, David Cournapeau > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Matthew Brett wrote: > > Hi David, > > > >>> Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery, linking > >>> steps - ATLAS in particul

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

On Jan 25, 2008 3:21 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Brett wrote: > > Hi David, > > > >>> Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery, linking > >>> steps - ATLAS in particular. > >> Don't trust the included doc: it is not up-to-date, and that's the part > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Neal Becker wrote: > Is numscons specific to numpy/scipy, or is it for building arbitrary python > extensions (replacing distutils?). I'm hoping for the latter. Actually, another way to answer your question: I am working on a patch such as the part of numscons which takes care of building python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Is numscons specific to numpy/scipy, or is it for building arbitrary python extensions (replacing distutils?). I'm hoping for the latter. ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Hi, > > I've attached the build logs. I noticed that, for atlas, you check > > for atlas_enum.c - but do you in fact need this for the build? > Now. I just wanted one header specific to atlas. It looks like not all > version of ATLAS install this one, unfortunately (3.8, for example). > > numpy.d

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi David, > >>> Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery, linking >>> steps - ATLAS in particular. >> Don't trust the included doc: it is not up-to-date, and that's the part >> which I totally redesigned since I wrote the initial doc. > >> - For a perflib

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Hi David, > > Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery, linking > > steps - ATLAS in particular. > Don't trust the included doc: it is not up-to-date, and that's the part > which I totally redesigned since I wrote the initial doc. > - For a perflib check to succeed, I try to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

dmitrey wrote: > Hi all, > I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something > essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why > can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? scons is a build system, like make. The difference being t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008/1/25, dmitrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something > essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why > can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? > Scons is a building system, li

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

dmitrey wrote: > Hi all, > I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something > essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why > can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? It's a very large, still experimental change to the entir

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Hi all, I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? Regards, D. David Cournapeau wrote: > > _

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi David > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:34:56AM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: >> I've just released the 0.3.0 release of numscons, an alternative >> build system for numpy. The tarballs are available on launchpad. >> >> https://launchpad.net/numpy.scons.support/0.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks again for doing this. I've been playing with the compilation - > should I email you direct with questions, to the lists? I don't think it would be inappropriate to use the current lists for that. > > Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discov

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Hi David On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:34:56AM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: > I've just released the 0.3.0 release of numscons, an alternative > build system for numpy. The tarballs are available on launchpad. > > https://launchpad.net/numpy.scons.support/0.3/0.3.0 > > To use it, you need to

[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

Hi, I've just released the 0.3.0 release of numscons, an alternative build system for numpy. The tarballs are available on launchpad. https://launchpad.net/numpy.scons.support/0.3/0.3.0 To use it, you need to get the build_with_scons numpy branch: see http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/