Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issue Tracking

2012-02-13 Thread jason-sage
On 2/13/12 2:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > I have the impression that the Cython / SAGE team are happy with their > Jenkins configuration. I'm not aware of a Jenkins buildbot system for Sage, though I think Cython uses such a system: https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/ We do have a num

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy performance testing

2011-12-29 Thread jason-sage
On 12/29/11 10:37 PM, Jaidev Deshpande wrote: > Hi! > >> Along with test coverage, have any of you considered any systematic >> monitoring of NumPy performance? > > I'm mildly obsessed with performance and benchmarking of NumPy. I used > to use a lot of MATLAB until a year back and I tend to compar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Reduced row echelon form

2008-11-18 Thread jason-sage
Anne Archibald wrote: > 2008/11/18 Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Is there a method in NumPy that reduces a matrix to it's reduced row echelon >> form? I'm brand new to both NumPy and linear algebra, and I'm not quite sure >> where to look. >> > > Unfortunately, reduced row-echelo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] (Late) summary of PEP-225 discussion at Scipy

2008-11-04 Thread jason-sage
Fernando Perez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > thanks for all the feedback. Last call on this one. If nobody > objects to the language that's written here: > > https://cirl.berkeley.edu/fperez/static/numpy-pep225/ > one small typo: in the "Why just go one step?" section, you have the phrase: "and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PyArray_SETITEM macro ends in semicolon

2008-09-25 Thread jason-sage
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I'm working on getting the Sage matrices for real/complex doubles to use >> numpy as a backend. In this, I'm using the PyArray_SETITEM macro from >> within Cython. However, Cython wraps the macro in a function call to >> convert th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.complex* functions do not call the __complex__ method

2008-09-25 Thread jason-sage
Neal Becker wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> In creating an array of type numpy.complex128, I'm having problems >> passing in Sage types that should be considered complex numbers since >> they implement the standard __complex__ method. However, numpy doesn't >> recognize that. Here's a

[Numpy-discussion] numpy.complex* functions do not call the __complex__ method

2008-09-24 Thread jason-sage
In creating an array of type numpy.complex128, I'm having problems passing in Sage types that should be considered complex numbers since they implement the standard __complex__ method. However, numpy doesn't recognize that. Here's a minimal example: In [1]: class MyNum: ...: def __comp

[Numpy-discussion] PyArray_SETITEM macro ends in semicolon

2008-09-24 Thread jason-sage
I'm working on getting the Sage matrices for real/complex doubles to use numpy as a backend. In this, I'm using the PyArray_SETITEM macro from within Cython. However, Cython wraps the macro in a function call to convert the output to a Python value: __pyx_1 = PyInt_FromLong(PyArray_SETITEM(