he language and environment first-class (like Boost.Python/pybind). Since
this thread is a survey over state and options it's my intent just to make
sure readers have something bare in mind for current pros/cons of the
approaches.
-Jason
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Ian Henriksen <
interested to
see ndarray gain support for pybind interoperability...
-Jason
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 1:08 PM, David Morris wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Michael Bieri wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> There are several ways on how to use C/C++ code from Python with NumPy,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:01:49 -0400, Jason Newton kirjoitti:
>> Does the ML have any ideas on how one could get a matmul that will not
>> allow any funny business on the evaluation of the products? Funny
>> business h
ebop.cs.berkeley.edu/reproblas/
https://exblas.lip6.fr/
-Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
"sizeof" a structure? AFAIK this is the
size of the last item + it's offset. If this doesn't exist... shouldn't it?
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
ontext loss
that way.
-Jason
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Alexander Eberspächer <
alex.eberspaec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24.09.2015 13:25, Christophe Bal wrote:
>
> > Can you give an example where GOTO is useful ?
>
> I think those pieces of code are best understood wit
doco patch to address https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/6191
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/compare/master...pizzathief:issue6191
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
in different outputs, but matlab seems perfectly happy living on an island
where it's the only implementation providing a specific answer given a
specific input.
- Numpy is 0 based...?
Good luck keeping it all sane though,
-Jason
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Kang Wang wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Nick Papior wrote:
> --
>
> Kind regards Nick Papior
> On 31 Jul 2015 17:53, "Chris Barker" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Jason Newton wrote:
> >>
> >> This really needs changing though. sc
uture in exchange for a few lashings for
the remainder of the year. Thankfully stdint like types have existed for
quite some times so protocol descriptions have been correct most of the
time.
-Jason
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Julian Taylor <
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
&
side. I plan on building a
helper class to generate the dictionaries for this subroutine since
something akin to the list dtype specification is more user-friendly
(even towards me).
-Jason
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Jason Newton wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The moderator for the
some complicated and time consuming code (both of
computer and developer) when ndarrays are what's called for.
Related - would one work with record dtypes passed to C? How would
one lookup fields and offsets within a structure?
Thanks for any advisement!
-Jason
___
#x27;t extensively use the linalg.svd routine in practice,
so I defer to those that use it.
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 10/24/13 1:42 PM, Peter Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Jason Grout
> mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> wrote:
>
> It would be really cool if you could hook into the new IPython comm
> infrastructure to push events back to the server in
mple:
https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/blob/master/static/compute_server.js#L768
and the python code is at
https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/blob/master/graphics.py#L399
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.
in github or somewhere to see how you made these
plots. Since Bokeh is (at least partly) about making beautiful plots
easy, showing off the source code is half of the story.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Grout
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-D
On 10/24/13 6:35 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> This looks really cool. I was checking out how easy it would be to
> embed in the Sage Cell Server [1]. I briefly looked at the code, and it
> appears that the IPython notebook mode does not use nodejs, redis,
> gevent, etc.? Is that righ
//github.com/ContinuumIO/bokeh
This looks really cool. I was checking out how easy it would be to
embed in the Sage Cell Server [1]. I briefly looked at the code, and it
appears that the IPython notebook mode does not use nodejs, redis,
gevent, etc.? Is that
or what it's worth) to being conservative with API changes as a
first resort.
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
. So it doesn't matter to us which way the decision goes.
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>> print None or None
None
Was this change between 1.5.1 and 1.7 intentional?
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
mple, I see an
article up on Hacker News about blaze, but there doesn't seem to be a
mention of big funding. Has someone written a press release? Has
someone submitted the grant news to Hacker News or Slashdot, where you
might attract attention and mindshare?
Thanks,
Jason
It's great to see a significant open-source python project that many of
us use on a day-to-day basis get such great funding!
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Grout
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/ma
ud, and then substitute in their standard markup for embedding
images. So it's just replacing the "upload your file to somewhere" to
"we'll upload it automatically to our own cloud."
That said, it is really important and very nic
the last person confused about it, given
the conventions in the other software packages.
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 10/22/12 3:03 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Jason Grout creativetrax.com> writes:
> [clip]
>> I think we've established that the other software mentioned does indeed
>> use the spectral norm by default. I'm still curious: what was the
>> reason for breaking
On 10/22/12 10:44 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> I'm curious why scipy/numpy defaults to calculating the Frobenius norm
> for matrices [1], when Matlab, Octave, and Mathematica all default to
> calculating the induced 2-norm [2]. Is it solely because the Frobenius
> norm is easier to
as the default. Does someone have
matlab to test their implementation? The fact that matlab has a
separate command for the Frobenius norm indicates that they also may be
using the spectral norm for the default matrix norm.
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Disc
On 10/22/12 10:56 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Jason Grout
> mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm curious why scipy/numpy defaults to calculating the Frobenius norm
> for matrices [1], when Matlab, Octave
n for doing things differently?
Thanks,
Jason
[1]
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.linalg.norm.html
[2]
* Matlab (http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/norm.html).
* Octave (http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/octave3/octave_198.html).
* Mathematica
t is currently marked as a
> blocker for 1.7.0.
You might ask on sage-devel. They were just talking about SPARC
machines the other day on sage-devel.
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> This was an explicit design choice. numpy.distutils will never import
> setuptools for you even if you have it installed. It will simply
> integrate with it if you have run the setup.py script from something
> that has setuptools imported, lik
I'm building numpy 1.6.2 for python 2.5 on centos 5.8.
I ran into a problem where bdist_egg was not working. It seems there's
a minor bug in numpy/distutils/core.py
Under python 2.5 the check for setuptools does not work, so the bdist
target for eggs is not available.
I've attached a patch that
In fact, since it's easy to switch the tags, it's easier than a
mailing list to shuttle a question to the right "mailing list"/tag.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Grout
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
t good for - discussion. Or maybe it's just I'm not
>> used to it.
>
> I'm in the same boat as you, but this discussion has made me much more
> interested in starting to use it
I'm curious: do you mean using stackexchange.com itself, or us
ask.sagemath.org (last commit to askbot was yesterday :). I think it's
as easy as 'pip install askbot' [1]
Jason
[1] http://askbot.org/doc/install.html
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
efore having to face a huge decision
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
t all. There have been multiple occasions where we
called on people to move their discussion to sage-flame, and overall
it's worked very nicely. Having a public forum to argue things out
seems to help, and my guess is that most of us may peek at it every now
and then for kicks and giggle
. Here's an issue that prevents Sage from upgrading to 1.6.2
from 1.5.1: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/291
People are actively working on it (Thanks! Travis commented 13 hours
ago about the root of the problem, I think).
Thanks,
Jason
ever I want to search trac, I just type "t " (t space) in the
URL bar of Chrome, then type whatever I'm searching for. Google almost
always pulls up the right ticket in the top few hits. And it's way
faster than the trac search.
Thanks,
Jason
__
don't need to spend our time setting up complicated
infrastructure. I do wish we could use Google Code issues with Github
pull requests, though :).
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
y
download all of its data to make an off-site backup not tied to a
commercial company.
>
>
> It would be good to hear from users of the IPython github issue tracker
> to see how they like it "in the wild". How problematic are these issues
> in practice. Does it reduce or increase the participation in issue
> tracking both by users and by developers.
I agree; it would be good to hear from someone with wider and broader
experience with the github tracker on these issues.
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
suppose the biggest frustrating part
about it is that it is closed source, so even if I did want to scratch
an itch, I can't.
That said, it is nice to have code and dev conversations happening in
one place. There are great things about github issues, of course. But
I'm not s
On 4/25/12 11:08 PM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.Is
>> that even possible?
>
> That is definitely possible and shouldn
fy (via
hitting a URL) about lots of events.
https://github.com/blog/964-all-of-the-hooks
http://developer.github.com/v3/repos/hooks/
I haven't actually used it (just read the docs), so I may be mistaken...
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
g.
>
>
> I think I missed that - is it on git somewhere?
>
>
> I thought so, but I can't find it either. We should ask Jason McCampbell
> of Enthought where the code is located. Here are the distributed eggs:
> http://www.enthought.com/repo/.iron/
>
> -Travis
>
Jan Groenewald posted this link to the Sage development list, and I
thought people here would be interested (and I figured people on the
matplotlib, scipy, and ipython lists would see it here too):
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7386/full/nature10836.html
Thanks,
Jason
ways, I've said enough on this, and we've seen enough problems in
discussions on this list already. Many people in the numpy community
know Cython well enough to judge these things for themselves.
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mail
On 2/17/12 9:54 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
> We would have to write a C++ programming tutorial that is based on Pyton
> knowledge instead of C knowledge.
I personally would love such a thing. It's been a while since I did
anything nontrivial on my own in
correctness and
stability, I'm sure the Cython devel list would love to hear about it.
They seem to be pretty concerned about stability and correctness to me,
though I admit I don't follow the list extremely deeply.
I don't trust any automated tool to generate bug-free code. I don't
even trust myself to generate bug-free code :).
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
"real" pull request
> ;-)
Time to start submitting lots of 1-line commits and typo fixes to pad my
karma :).
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 2/16/12 6:23 AM, Francesc Alted wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/12 6:27 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>> But in the very end, when agreement can't be reached by other
>>> means, the developers are the one maki
resting point. I hope I'm not pitching a log onto the fire here,
but in numpy's case, there are very many capable developers on other
projects who depend on numpy who could credibly threaten a fork if they
felt numpy was drastically going wrong.
Jason
__
e, would the Foundation apply to mentor Google Summer of
Code projects?
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
till have to change versions by hand and start the builders by
hand (in theory, this could be automated but in practice, this is not so
easy).
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
e do have a number of systems we build and test Sage on, though I don't
think we have continuous integration yet. I've CCd Jeroen Demeyer, who
is the current release manager for Sage. Jeroen, do we have an
automatic buildbot system for Sage?
Thanks,
the
issue number does not appear in the listing. So when you are trying to
refer to another issue, and try finding it by scanning the list, you
have to mouse over the title and extract the information mentally from
the url.
Google code issues are much, much bette
ub, but still maybe
useful)
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Here is the discussion:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/8lq3twm9Olc
Here is our ticket tracking the issue:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12168
Here are some examples of the analysis: http://sagenb.org/home/pub
f it's just me ;)
Just a thought: what if this also worked:
a.mask[0:2]=np.NA
as a synonym for a.mask[0:2]=True?
Would that be less confusing, and/or would it be less powerful or
extensible in important ways?
Thanks,
Jason Grout
___
NumPy-Di
ictating code to someone (e.g.,
teaching, or helping someone verbally), it's going to be hard to
distinguish between the verbal sounds of "NA" and "MA".
And from a lurker (me), thanks for the discussion. I find it very
interesting to read.
Thanks,
Jason Grout
p through University of
Washington, and UW (IIRC) handles all of these details. I think it has
worked out well (though, of course, William is the one to ask).
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman
re unit tests,
but the requirement right now is only for doctests.
Jason
--
Jason Grout
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
lear communication. I see that as a very responsible thing to do,
given the intensity of some of the feelings in this discussion.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Grout
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
here, but we're just ignoring it. Of
course, that goes against common convention, but it might be easier to
explain.
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 4/26/11 3:18 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 4/26/11 11:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> But apparently either there's a bug, or the LAPACK man page needs to
>> be understood as you say.
>
> I've posted a question to the Lapack forum:
>
> http://icl.cs.utk.edu/
On 4/26/11 3:29 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:52:52 -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> [clip]
>> The updated rwork calculation makes no difference with a 3x4 matrix
>> (both the old calculation and the new calculation give 66 in the 3x4
>> case), so I don&#
On 4/26/11 11:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> But apparently either there's a bug, or the LAPACK man page needs to
> be understood as you say.
I've posted a question to the Lapack forum:
http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=
On 4/26/11 11:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:36:19 -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> [clip]
>> Okay, just one more data point. Our people that are seeing the problem
>> with numpy returning a non-unitary V also see a non-unitary V being
>> returned by the te
On 4/26/11 11:22 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 4/26/11 11:12 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 4/26/11 11:07 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> And indeed, I get a 0 row as the last row of the V**H matrix
>>
>> I just double-checked things one last time and saw that I actual
On 4/26/11 11:12 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 4/26/11 11:07 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> And indeed, I get a 0 row as the last row of the V**H matrix
>
> I just double-checked things one last time and saw that I actually
> hadn't changed the first argument of zgesdd to &q
On 4/26/11 11:07 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> And indeed, I get a 0 row as the last row of the V**H matrix
I just double-checked things one last time and saw that I actually
hadn't changed the first argument of zgesdd to "A" in the program that I
actually ran. So with this chang
On 4/25/11 12:57 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> The Numpy routine is a very thin wrapper of LAPACK's ZGESDD, and probably
> cannot have any bugs of this kind,
As noted in my other message, I've been digging through the ZGESDD docs
to understand it better. Here is the doc string for what becomes the
e.
I doubt this fix will fix the problem on this thread, but it makes sense
to make the change anyway.
Thanks,
Jason
[1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/numpy/linalg/linalg.py#L1300
[2] http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.
e notebook frontend). You can also
launch terminal sessions with Sage, use Sage from the command line, etc.
Or you can compile from source, which is I believe what the above
instructions are about.
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discuss
he Python-independent core and might
be helpful for what you are trying to do. It has not been released as a part
of an official numpy release yet (under consideration as the core of 2.0)
but has been released as the first beta version of NumPy and SciPy for .NET.
Regards,
Jason
On Mon, Mar 7,
ct.
Maybe even better would be to add a shape option to np.diag, and then
just make the first line of the svd docstring say
u*np.diag(s,shape=(a.shape[0],a.shape[1]))*v
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.sc
Dec 4, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:24:49 -0600, Ilan Schnell wrote:
>> > I'm not sure how reasonable it would be to move only libndarray into the
>> > master, because I've been working on EPD for the last couple of week.
>
hould be able
to switch to using this repository now.
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:37:19 -0600, Jason McCampbell wrote:
> >> Sure:
> >>
> >>https://github.com/numpy/numpy-refactor
> >
refactor branch.
I'm open either way, just wanted to throw this out there.
Jason
>
> --
> Pauli Virtanen
>
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinf
Hi Chuck, Pauli,
This is indeed a good time to bring this up as we are in the process fixing
Python 3 issues and then merging changes from the master tree in preparation
for being able to consider merging the work. More specific comments inline
below.
Regards,
Jason
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3
e
line/hunk, or clicking on the icon next to the file), and double-check
that everything is the way I want it. I can also check a box to amend
the last commit (and see exactly what that last commit was).
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Jason McCampbell <
> jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Jason McCampbell <
> jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck (and anyone else interested),
>>
>> I updated the refactoring page on the Nu
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Jason McCampbell <
> jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck (and anyone else interested),
>>
>> I updated the refactoring page on the NumPy developer wi
opics that needs to be filled in.
Regards,
Jason
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jason McCampbell <
> jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote:
>
>> Chuck,
>>
>>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jason McCampbell <
> jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote:
>
>> Chuck,
>>
>> I will update the wiki page on the Numpy develope
nventions but
certainly more needs to be done!
I'll write it up for everyone this week but feel free to email me with other
questions.
Regards,
Jason
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
On 7/29/10 1:37 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> (Book of Guido, 7:42)
That's intriguing. Do you happen to have a link to it?
Thanks,
Jason
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hi Chuck,
Good questions. Responses inline below...
Jason
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Jason McCampbell <
> jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> This is a follow-up
All of this, particularly the interface/core function designations, is a
first analysis and in flux. The goal is to get the information out and
elicit discussion and feedback from the community.
Best regards,
Jason
Jason McCampbell
Enthought, Inc.
___
com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/ba2b69a8fd8d45f6.
The cool thing is that the numpy arrays can use these objects as
naturally as other python objects.
Thanks,
Jason
[1] http://www.sagemath.org
[2] http://www.mpfr.org
___
NumPy-Dis
MissingClass(object):
pass
Cheers,
Jason
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:00 PM, dagmar wismeijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to open (using numpy) old pickled data files that I once
> created using numarray, but I keep getting the message that there is no
> module numa
teresting to hear of a
problem where one can't separate observed/hidden variables :)
Cheers,
Jason
--
Jason Rennie
Research Scientist, ITA Software
617-714-2645
http://www.itasoftware.com/
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@sci
climbing
algorithms (besides its present-ability and ease of implementation).
Cheers,
Jason
--
Jason Rennie
Research Scientist, ITA Software
617-714-2645
http://www.itasoftware.com/
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
dered how much the
Gaussianity assumption is hurting you?
Jason
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:17 AM, David Cournapeau <
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > I am using the heuristic exposed in
> > http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumb
for findability, but it should simply
serve as documentation for how to do matrix stuff with nparray.
Cheers,
Jason
--
Jason Rennie
Research Scientist, ITA Software
617-714-2645
http://www.itasoftware.com/
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
N
rally
shouldn't be installing packages by hand as it sounds like you are doing.
This post suggests that the latest version of Ubuntu is up-to-date wrt
ATLAS:
http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@scipy.org/msg13102.html
Jason
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:44 AM, David Paul Reichert &
Thanks for the responses. I did not realize that dot() would do matrix
multiplication which was the main reason I was looking for a matrix-like
class. Like you and Tom suggested, I think it's best to stick to arrays.
Cheers,
Jason
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:45 PM, David Warde-Farley
vector?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Rennie
Research Scientist, ITA Software
http://www.itasoftware.com/
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
