'2',3])
>> Error in lines 1-1
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> TypeError: unable to find a common ring for all elements
>>
>> In : Matrix([[1,2,3],[4,5]])
>> ValueError: List of rows is not valid (rows are wrong types or lengths)
>>
>>
On 11-Feb-15 12:13 PM, Alan G Isaac
wrote:
Just recalling the one-year-ago discussion:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/56494
Alan Isaac
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@s
.
On 11-Feb-15 12:19 PM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
On Mi, 2015-02-11 at 11:38 -0500, cjw wrote:
On 11-Feb-15 10:47 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
On Di, 2015-02-10 at 15:07 -0700, cjw wrote:
It seems to be agreed that there
Could you say which version you are using please?
Colin W
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:07 PM, cjw wrote:
It seems to be agreed that there are weaknesses in the existing Numpy
Matrix
Class.
Some problems are illustrated below.
I'll try to put
On 11-Feb-15 10:47 AM, Sebastian Berg
wrote:
On Di, 2015-02-10 at 15:07 -0700, cjw wrote:
It seems to be agreed that there are weaknesses in the existing Numpy Matrix
Class.
Some problems are illustrated below.
Not to delve
It seems to be agreed that there are weaknesses in the existing Numpy Matrix
Class.
Some problems are illustrated below.
I'll try to put some suggestions over the coming weeks and would appreciate
comments.
Colin W.
Test Script:
if __name__ == '__main__':
a= mat([4, 5, 6])
On 09-Feb-15 2:34 AM, Stefan Reiterer
wrote:
Ok that are indeed some good reasons to keep the status quo, especially since
performance is crucial for numpy.
It's a dillemma: Using the matrix class for linear algebra would be the correct
way for such thing,
bu
On 08-Feb-15 5:47 PM, Nathaniel Smith
wrote:
On 8 Feb 2015 13:39, "Simon Wood" wrote:
I find the broadcasting aspect of Numpy a turn off. If I go to add a 1x3
vector to a 3x1 vector, I want the program to warn me or error out. I
On 27-Jan-15 5:32 AM, Carl Kleffner
wrote:
2015-01-27 0:16 GMT+01:00 Sturla Molden :
On 26/01/15 16:30, Carl Kleffner wrote:
Thanks for all your ideas. The next version will contain an augumented
libopenblas.dll in both nu
On 24-Jan-15 12:14 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote:
> Just a wild guess:
>
> (1) update your pip and try again
Thanks. My pip version was 1,5,6, it is now 6.0.6
>
> (2) use the bitbucket wheels with:
> pip install --no-index -f
> https://bitbucket.org/carlkl/mingw-w64-for-python/downloads numpy
Successfu
On 22-Jan-15 6:23 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote:
>> I took time to create mingw-w64 based wheels of numpy-1.9.1 and scipy-0.15.1
>> source distributions and put them on
>> https://bitbucket.org/carlkl/mingw-w64-for-python/downloads as well as on
Thanks,
Colin W.
On 22-Jan-15 5:42 PM, Carl Kleffner
wrote:
Yes,
I build win32 as well as amd64 binaries.
Carlkl
2015-01-22 23:06 GMT+01:00 cjw :
Thanks Carl,
This is good to hear. I presume that the AMD64 is covered.
Colin
Thanks Carl,
This is good to hear. I presume that the AMD64 is covered.
Colin W.
On 22-Jan-15 4:29 PM, Carl Kleffner
wrote:
I took time to create mingw-w64 based wheels of numpy-1.9.1 and
scipy-0.15.1 source distributions and put them on
https
Paul,
Wot, no AMD64?
Colin W.
On 11-Jan-15 12:50 PM, Paul Virtanen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear all,
>
> We are pleased to announce the Scipy 0.15.0 release.
>
> The 0.15.0 release contains bugfixes and new features, most important
> of which are mentioned in
Thanks Alexander,
I'll look at Sage.
Colin W.
On 06-Jan-15 8:38 PM, Alexander
Belopolsky wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Since matrices are now part of some high school curricula,
error message.
In these circumstances, I hope that the Development Team will wish to
treat this as a bug.
Regards,
Colin W.
On 06-Jan-15 8:20 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:58 AM, cjw wrote:
>> My recollection, from discussions, at
On 06-Jan-15 7:31 AM, Sturla Molden
wrote:
On 06/01/15 02:08, cjw wrote:
This is not a comment on any present matrix support, but deals with the
matrix class, which existed back when Todd Miller of the Space Telescope
Group supported numpy
Nathaniel,
This is not a comment on any present matrix support, but deals with
the matrix class, which existed back when Todd Miller of the Space
Telescope Group supported numpy.
Matrix is a sub-class of ndarray.
I'm suggesting that anything which is pr
On 05-Jan-15 1:56 PM, Davidid wrote:
> On 5 January 2015 at 20:40, Colin J. Williams
> wrote:
>
>> This illustrates a failure, which is reported later in the calculation:
>>
>> A2= np.matrix([[1, 2, -2], [-3, -1, 4], [4, 2 -6]])
>>
>> Here 2 - 6 is treated as an expression.
>>
> There should be
On 08-Sep-14 4:40 PM, Joseph Martinot-Lagarde wrote:
> Le 08/09/2014 15:29, Stefan Otte a écrit :
>> Hey,
>>
>> quite often I work with block matrices. Matlab offers the convenient notation
>>
>> [ a b; c d ]
This would appear to be a desirable way to go.
Numpy has something similar for str
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Does a `mergesorted` function make sense?
On 02/09/2014 8:40 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
mailto:hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Charles R Harris
mailto:charlesr.har...@gmai
Charles,
Nothing I've seen so far envisages disturbing the existing, in my
opinion flawed, Matrix Class.
I trust that I have not missed anything.
Compilation is a complex press for a person unfamiliar with the C.
Anything you could do to simplify that would be welcome.
Colin W.
On 12/08/2
On 07/08/2014 5:40 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> On Mi, 2014-08-06 at 14:05 -0700, Chris Barker wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> Should also mention that we don't have the ability to operate
>> on stacked vectors because they can't be identif
23 matches
Mail list logo
