Re: [Numpy-discussion] [Python-3000] PEP 31XX: A Type Hierarchy for Numbers (and other algebraic entities)

2007-05-03 Thread Steven Bethard
On 4/30/07, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > GvR wrote: > > So how about we reduce the scope of our (!) PEP (or perhaps of a new > > one) to two items: (a) add @abstractmethod, and (b) overload > > isinstance() and issubclass()? Library authors can do everything they > > want with those, a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [Python-3000] PEP 31XX: A Type Hierarchy for Numbers (and other algebraic entities)

2007-05-03 Thread Steven Bethard
On 4/29/07, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it were technically possible, I would recommend that this PEP have to > run the same gauntlet that any other large library addition would, which > is to go through a long period of community feedback and criticism, > during which a large number of p