like in the current fromiter method.
On 15 December 2015 at 08:08, Stephan Sahm wrote:
> I would like to further push Benjamin Root's suggestion:
>
> "Therefore, I think it is not out of the realm of reason that passing a
> generator object and a dtype could then delegate t
I would like to further push Benjamin Root's suggestion:
"Therefore, I think it is not out of the realm of reason that passing a
generator object and a dtype could then delegate the work under the hood to
np.fromiter()? I would even go so far as to raise an error if one passes a
generator without
und a compelling argument for leaving this Feature missing (to
remember, it is already implemented in a branch)
Please let me know if you know about an argument,
best,
Stephan
On 27 November 2015 at 14:18, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On 11/27/2015 5:37 AM, Stephan Sahm wrote:
>
>> I like to re
[ this
request
/discussion refers to numpy issue
#5863
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/5863#issuecomment-159738368 ]
Dear all,
As far as I can think, the expected functionality of np.array(...) would be
np.array(list(...)) or something even nicer.
Therefore, I like to reques
