Still working on it, it's unfortunately taking much more time than I'd
anticipated.
Cheers,
Sankarshan Mudkavi
On Jun 9, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I take nothing ever happened to clean up the datetime64 timezone mess?
>
> sigh.
>
> -Chris
>
>
, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Sankarshan Mudkavi
> wrote:
>
> I've written a rather rudimentary NEP, (lacking in technical details which I
> will hopefully add after some further discussion and receiving
> clarification/help on this thread).
>
> Please let me know how to pr
; 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
> Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
>
> chris.bar...@noaa.gov
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mail
ypes the better.
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
--
Sankarshan Mudkavi
Undergraduate in Physics,
to float: garbage
>
> (Cf, "Errors should never pass silently".) Any reason why datetime64
> should be different?
>
> -n
>
> --
> Nathaniel J. Smith
> Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh
> http://vorpus.org
> _________
; Thanks for pushing this forward!
> -n
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Apologies for the delay in following up, here is an expanded version of the
>> proposal, which hopefully clears up most of the details. I have not included
>> specific implementation details
NEPs?Please find attached the expanded proposal, and the rendered version is available here:https://github.com/Sankarshan-Mudkavi/numpy/blob/Enhance-datetime64/doc/neps/datetime-improvement-proposal.rst
datetime-improvement-proposal.rst
Description: Binary data
I look forward to comments
t;
>
>
>
> -n
>
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
> Oceano
ty to
handle them if provided.
A big thanks to Chris Barker for the write up linked in the proposal, it makes
it very clear what the various possibilities are for improvement.
Cheers,
Sankarshan
On Mar 20, 2014, at 7:16 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2014 02:07, "Sankarshan Mu
___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hi all,
I've written a rather rudimentary NEP, (lacking in technical details which I
will hopefully add after some further discussion and receiving
Hey all,
It's been a while since the last datetime and timezones discussion thread was
visited (linked below):
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/53805
It looks like the best approach to follow is the UTC only approach in the
linked thread with an optional flag to indica
11 matches
Mail list logo
