On 28 May 2015 at 10:05, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Andrew Collette
> wrote:
>>
>> > Here is their lame excuse:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://sourceforge.net/blog/gimp-win-project-wasnt-hijacked-just-abandoned/
>> >
>> > It probably means this:
>> >
>> > If NumPy inst
Everything's working now. I just messed up the rows and columns.
Thanks a lot, guys.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 21:14, Saket <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, I'm getting different numbers
Also, I'm getting different numbers when I do the above using eig(A)
and eigh(A). I thought eigh would be faster, but would still give the
same results...
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Saket <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... so the relationship Ax = Lx should hold for ev
thought maybe the ith eigenvector corresponds to a different (not
the ith) eigenvalue, but there doesn't seem to be any eigenvalue which
corresponds to the ith eigenvector such that the relationship holds...
Thanks again.
Saket
atlas_threads_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
blas_opt_info:
libr
ing? I did some computations myself
and it looks like the Matlab output is correct. Just seems like the
eigenvectors that Numpy is returning are wrong...
Thanks for any suggestions.
Saket
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scip
