On 04/26/2011 11:25 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> I think it is worth testing if this change fixes it. Note that current
> LAPACK docs have the number 7 there instead of 5, so there may really be
> a bug here.
It appears to me the problem is more subtle than just a strict comparison
between the num
On 04/26/2011 10:19 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> If it is an Accelerate bug it got fixed on OS X 10.6. Below is the
> output with both current master and 1.5.1. It may be worth checking
> this on 10.5 with the binary Numpy installer from Sourceforge to make
> sure it's not the Sage build process causi
Thanks for the reply, Pauli. I suspected this might be the case, but was
hoping
maybe this was something that had been seen before. I've included your
suggestions on the bug report for Sage.
Rob
On 04/25/2011 10:57 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> The Numpy routine is a very thin wrapper of LAPAC
I am working to make many of NumPy's matrix decomposition routines available in
Sage. As part of testing a new routine, we have found some odd behavior with
the singular value decomposition.
On certain Mac's, the numpy built in Sage will return the second of the unitary
matrices with a row of
